2020
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000553.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portosystemic shunts versus endoscopic intervention with or without medical treatment for prevention of rebleeding in people with cirrhosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different therapeutic procedures are used including drug treatments (non-cardio selective beta-blockers, or isosorbide mononitrate or both), endoscopic interventions (ligation of oesophageal varices, or sclerotherapy), blood shunts (total shunt, transjugular portosystemic or distal splenorenal shunt). The superiority of an intervention over another has not been demonstrated [30]. However, the best treatment remains the prevention by treating the cause of the cirrhosis (alcohol withdrawal or effective antiviral treatment) [31].…”
Section: Symptomatic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different therapeutic procedures are used including drug treatments (non-cardio selective beta-blockers, or isosorbide mononitrate or both), endoscopic interventions (ligation of oesophageal varices, or sclerotherapy), blood shunts (total shunt, transjugular portosystemic or distal splenorenal shunt). The superiority of an intervention over another has not been demonstrated [30]. However, the best treatment remains the prevention by treating the cause of the cirrhosis (alcohol withdrawal or effective antiviral treatment) [31].…”
Section: Symptomatic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the superiority of bypass techniques, whether surgical or radiological, over iterative endoscopic treatment remains debated. The objective disadvantage of endoscopy is the need for multiple sessions, which limits its application in countries with constrained resources where patients do not have easy access to health care centers (3). Similarly, the cost and availability of recent interventional radiology shunt techniques also limits the use of these procedures in these same regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%