2007
DOI: 10.1109/mis.2007.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portia: A User-Adapted Persuasion System in the Healthy-Eating Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Masthoff et al (2013) showed that the content of prompts in the charity domain needs to be personalized to gender, age, religion and country affinity. -Adaptation of persuasive arguments to user preferences ( Grasso et al 2000;Carenini and Moore 2006) and user goals as inferred partially from user personality (Mazzotta et al 2007). For an argument to be effective, it needs to be within the so-called latitude of acceptance; i.e.…”
Section: Theories Techniques and The Need For Personalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Masthoff et al (2013) showed that the content of prompts in the charity domain needs to be personalized to gender, age, religion and country affinity. -Adaptation of persuasive arguments to user preferences ( Grasso et al 2000;Carenini and Moore 2006) and user goals as inferred partially from user personality (Mazzotta et al 2007). For an argument to be effective, it needs to be within the so-called latitude of acceptance; i.e.…”
Section: Theories Techniques and The Need For Personalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If compared with the richness of human persuasion messages, the examples we included in this chapter suggest how difficult it is to generate a "good" text: the strategy must be instantiated into a "discourse plan" in which the items to mention, their presentation order, and the rhetorical relations among them have to be carefully established. The plan has then to be translated into a natural language message, implying a phase of "surface generation," in which careful choice of the syntax and wording of sentences must be applied (Mazzotta et al, 2007). Some suggestions on how this task may be accomplished are already available: a variety of "argumentation schemes" have been proposed that formalize the structure of an argumentation text in terms of premises and conclusions (Walton, 1996b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we provide a brief overview of the system. For a more detailed description of PORTIA, please refer to [14] It mainly focuses on two typical aspects of the human persuasion in order to produce effective persuasion attempt in different contexts: on one hand, the ability of reasoning on the potential strength of alternative persuasive strategies for a given user, in order to select the most appropriate one; on the other hand, the capability of combining rational and emotional modes of persuasion, according to the theory of a-rational persuasion [16]. The strategies represented in the model are the result of a combination of theoretical [22,23,18]) and empirical [13] background.…”
Section: An Overview Of Portiamentioning
confidence: 99%