2004
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.653105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio Selection with Heavy Tails

Abstract: Consider the portfolio problem of choosing the mix between stocks and bonds under a downside risk constraint. Typically stock returns exhibit fatter tails than bonds corresponding to their greater downside risk. Downside risk criteria like the safety …rst criterion therefore often select corner solutions in the sense of a bonds only portfolio. This is due to a focus on the asymptotically dominating …rst order Pareto term of the portfolio return distribution. We show that if second order terms are taken into ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(7 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the second-order approximation of the VaR of X = ωX 1 + (1 − ω)X 2 provided in Hyung and de Vries (2007). The approximation depends on the comparison between α 2 − α 1 and min{γ 1 , 1}.…”
Section: Tail Index Equivalence: Second-order Tail Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the second-order approximation of the VaR of X = ωX 1 + (1 − ω)X 2 provided in Hyung and de Vries (2007). The approximation depends on the comparison between α 2 − α 1 and min{γ 1 , 1}.…”
Section: Tail Index Equivalence: Second-order Tail Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a series of papers by Hyung and de Vries (2002, 2005, 2007, the portfolio diversification problem is studied by assuming a specific dependence structure such as the single-index factor market model, the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). Hyung and de Vries (2002) confirm Fama and Miller's conclusion in a dependent setup with the specific dependence structure, the CAPM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern portfolio optimization methods also take into account the possible tail-weightiness of the returns' distribution. We may refer to the works of Hyung and De Vries (2007) and Jansen et al (2000), which are based on the safety-first criterion, in order to take into account the probability of big losses. Moreover, related papers (Ortobelli et al 2010;Ortobelli and Rachev 2001) also propose and discuss some stable Paretian models for optimal portfolio selection and for quantifying the risk of a given portfolio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%