2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio selection using hierarchical Bayesian analysis and MCMC methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, if the gain in the performance does not cover the extra transaction costs, less accurate, but less variable weighting strategies would be preferred. To study this issue we define portfolio turnover as (Greyserman et al, 2006):…”
Section: Hedge Fund Portfolio Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, if the gain in the performance does not cover the extra transaction costs, less accurate, but less variable weighting strategies would be preferred. To study this issue we define portfolio turnover as (Greyserman et al, 2006):…”
Section: Hedge Fund Portfolio Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this framework we rely on our beliefs or prior information about the parameters of the model and formalize these beliefs in form of prior distributions. The most frequently applied priors for µ and Σ in the financial literature are the diffuse prior (see, e.g., Barry (1974), Brown (1976), and Klein and Bawa (1976)), the conjugate prior (Frost and Savarino (1986)), and the hierarchical prior (Greyserman et al (2006)) which we introduce next. The diffuse prior is an uninformative prior, which implies that the statistician has no additional information about the stochastic nature of the unknown parameters.…”
Section: Bayesian Vs Frequentist Portfolio Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we consider the hierarchial Bayes model which was suggested by Greyserman et al (2006). They demonstrated that a fully hierarchical Bayes procedure produces promising results warranting more study.…”
Section: Hierarchical Priormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, if the gain in the performance does not cover the extra transaction costs, less accurate, but less variable weighting strategies would be preferred. To study this issue we define portfolio turnover as in Greyserman et al (2006), that is the sum of the absolute changes in the portfolio weights from the previous month to that month. This metric intuitively represents the fraction of the portfolio value that has to be liquidated/reallocated at the point of rebalancing.…”
Section: Traditional Allocation Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%