2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9965.2006.00272.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio Optimization With Downside Constraints

Abstract: We consider the portfolio optimization problem for an investor whose consumption rate process and terminal wealth are subject to downside constraints. In the standard financial market model that consists of d risky assets and one riskless asset, we assume that the riskless asset earns a constant instantaneous rate of interest, r > 0, and that the risky assets are geometric Brownian motions. The optimal portfolio policy for a wide scale of utility functions is derived explicitly. The gradient operator and the C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paper by Lakner and Nygren [7] considers a similar problem. They maximize expected utility from consumption and terminal wealth when both the consumption rate and terminal wealth must not fall below a given minimum consumption level and a minimum wealth level, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The paper by Lakner and Nygren [7] considers a similar problem. They maximize expected utility from consumption and terminal wealth when both the consumption rate and terminal wealth must not fall below a given minimum consumption level and a minimum wealth level, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Korn and Wiese (2008) (2006) where not only the terminal wealth but also a continuous consumption rate is restricted downwards in a strict sense. As all other above-mentioned papers with constraints on wealth, Lakner and Nygren (2006) use the martingale approach. We distinguish ourselves by using dynamic programming and by allowing for non-strict constraints.…”
Section: Basak Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now decompose this two-period problem into two one-period problems and a one-dimensional maximization problem. The line of arguments is adapted from Lakner and Nygren (2006), but since our constraints are not strict we need to deal with ε 1 and ε 2 in the right way. We start with an admissible pair (π, C) and define…”
Section: Constraints On Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations