2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio optimization with an envelope-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
83
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of domain appears in portfolio optimization problems with buy-in thresholds [5]. Note that it is allowed to choose all D i differently, so that Problem (1) also contains the mixed-integer case.…”
Section: The New Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of domain appears in portfolio optimization problems with buy-in thresholds [5]. Note that it is allowed to choose all D i differently, so that Problem (1) also contains the mixed-integer case.…”
Section: The New Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective function minimizes the expected return by considering budget constrain. For more details, please see Chang et al (2000), Branke et al (2009) and Soleimani et al (2009). The proposed model has been applied on monthly information gathered from Tehran Stock Exchange by considering Covariance between stock returns and mentioned industries, budget, investor optimum efficiency, free float stock, etc.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The explained that the new model could be formulated as an Np-Hard problem and they proposed a genetic algorithm to solve the resulted model. Branke et al (2009) proposed to combined an active set algorithm optimized for portfolio selection into a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA). The idea was to let the MOEA come up with some convex subsets of the set of all possible portfolios, solve a critical line algorithm for each subset, and then merge the partial solutions into a solution of the original non-convex problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this problem researchers define a constraint named cardinality. Cardinality is considered as a constraint in many researches such as: Gupta et al (2008), Chang et al (2009), Branke et al (2009), Golmakani & Fazel (2011), Yang et al (2011, Anagnostopoulos & Mamanis (2011) and Woodside-Oriakhi et al (2011). Anagnostopoulos & Mamanis (2010) proposed cardinality as an objective function that should be minimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%