2022
DOI: 10.3390/e24121705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio Efficiency Tests with Conditioning Information—Comparing GMM and GEL Estimators

Abstract: We evaluate the use of generalized empirical likelihood (GEL) estimators in portfolio efficiency tests for asset pricing models in the presence of conditional information. The use of conditional information is relevant to portfolio management as it allows for checking whether asset allocations are efficiently exploiting all the information available in the market. Estimators from the GEL family present some optimal statistical properties, such as robustness to misspecifications and better properties in finite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be noted that the GRS test does not accommodate short-selling restrictions (Fletcher [18]). Vigo-Pereira and Laurini [19] stated that for the GRS test to be effective the error terms have to be i.i.d N(0,1), normally distributed ~N(µ, σ 2 );…”
Section: The Gibbons Ross and Shanken Test Statistic And Its Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be noted that the GRS test does not accommodate short-selling restrictions (Fletcher [18]). Vigo-Pereira and Laurini [19] stated that for the GRS test to be effective the error terms have to be i.i.d N(0,1), normally distributed ~N(µ, σ 2 );…”
Section: The Gibbons Ross and Shanken Test Statistic And Its Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concern is referred to as Roll's critique [3]. The EIV problem poses challenges in estimating the CAPM and assessing its empirical validity, and notably impacts investment decisions [4,5] as well as testing procedures for portfolio efficiency [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%