2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2004.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio diversification benefits within Europe: Implications for a US investor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same way, recent study of Fletcher (2018) concluded that yet the benefits of international diversification are significant. Laopodis (2005) argued that analysts said that financial integration among global capital markets has reduced IPD's benefits by increasing the correlation between equity markets. Coeurdacier and Guibaud (2011) argue that both theories and empirical evidence suggest that financial integration between countries has a positive impact on the correlation between equity markets, which tends to reduce IPD's benefits.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way, recent study of Fletcher (2018) concluded that yet the benefits of international diversification are significant. Laopodis (2005) argued that analysts said that financial integration among global capital markets has reduced IPD's benefits by increasing the correlation between equity markets. Coeurdacier and Guibaud (2011) argue that both theories and empirical evidence suggest that financial integration between countries has a positive impact on the correlation between equity markets, which tends to reduce IPD's benefits.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rezayat and Yavas (2006) examined short-term co-movements between the five major stock markets (USA, UK, France, Germany and Japan) to assess the benefits of International Portfolio Diversification (IPD) and concluded that despite the fact that there is still room for diversification, the benefits are minimal for American and European investors who would like to invest exclusively in these two major economic blocs (Europe and America). Laopodis (2005) argued that analysts is of the opininon that financial integration among global capital markets has reduced IPD's benefits by increasing the correlation between equity markets. Coeurdacier and Guibaud (2011) argue that both theories and empirical evidence suggest that financial integration between countries has a positive impact on the correlation between equity markets, which tends to reduce IPD's benefits.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a significant body of papers has documented the nature of long-term relations in both Asian (Yang and Siregar 2001, Azman-Saini 2002, Manning (2002, Phylaktis and Ravazollo, 2005, Laopodis, 2005, Chang and Caudill, 2006and Choudhry, 2007 and European (Serletis and King 1997, Chan et al, 1997, Rangvid, 2001, Phengpis and Apilado, 2004, Voronkova, 2004, Yang et al, 2006, Syriopoulos, 2007and Aggarwal et al, 2009 African stock markets and use, in addition to a regime switching cointegration methodology, the nonparametric cointegration model of Breitung (2002) and the stochastic volatility cointegration model of Harris et al, (2002).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%