2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01658.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique and future prospects

Abstract: This treatment does not increase the risks associated with major liver resection. It may be indicated in selected patients before major resection. Future prospective studies are needed to define more clearly the indications for this evolving technique.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
263
1
13

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 392 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
8
263
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3,25,26,29 Currently, FLR size and factors potentially compromising liver function (cirrhosis or hepatitis and previous chemotherapy) are criteria by which patients are selected for portal vein embolization. 27,28,30 Small remnant liver volumes after hepatectomy may negatively influence outcome for different reasons. First, hepatic reserve may be reduced because of preexisting liver disease, and the liver remaining after hepatectomy may not provide sufficient function despite apparent adequate volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3,25,26,29 Currently, FLR size and factors potentially compromising liver function (cirrhosis or hepatitis and previous chemotherapy) are criteria by which patients are selected for portal vein embolization. 27,28,30 Small remnant liver volumes after hepatectomy may negatively influence outcome for different reasons. First, hepatic reserve may be reduced because of preexisting liver disease, and the liver remaining after hepatectomy may not provide sufficient function despite apparent adequate volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with bile duct tumors, measurement of the compromised liver (because of bile duct dilatation, cholangitis, or vascular obstruction) may not be relevant using this formula. 2,19,27,28 An alternate method of assessing the remnant liver similar to the method used before transplantation, which does not include tumor volume or resected volume, recently has been proposed. It is based on the FLR-TLV ratio.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even after preoperative chemotherapy or PVE, some patients cannot become eligible for complete CRLM resection through a single hepatectomy. PVE combined with a two-stage resection may be helpful in such circumstances [25]. However, for patients who cannot undergo liver resection because of extensive liver metastases and inadequate remnant liver volume, RFA can play an important role when combined with liver resection [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients for PVE should be selected carefully and PVE should be avoided in patients with an adequate future liver remnant. At present, selection of patients for PVE is based on CT/MRI volumetry, and 30% of future liver remnant volume is considered adequate in patients with normal liver and 40% in patients with abnormal liver function (Abdalla et al, 2001). Incorporating hepatic functional studies, such as hepatic scintigraphy (Dinant et al, 2007) and biopsy of normal liver, to evaluate histological abnormality (steatosis, steatohepatitis and cholestasis) in patients with borderline future liver remnant will provide further information on the quality of the residual liver and may avoid unnecessary PVE.…”
Section: P=0442mentioning
confidence: 99%