RE QUWIn order to minimize the size and weight of the x-ray or neutron source for a series of portable radiographic linear accelerators, the x-ray head was packaged separately from the rest of the system and consists of only the inac accelerating struc;ture, electron gun, built-in target, collimator, ion pump and an RF w I ndow. Al I the dr I v i ng e ectron I cs and cooling are connected to the x-ray head through f l exI b I e wavegu I de, cab I es, and waterl I nes. The x-ray head has been kept smal I and I Ight weight by using the RF fields for radial focusing, as wel I as for longitudinal bunching and accelerating the beam. Thus, no external, bulky magnetic focusing devices are required. The RF focusing Is accomplI shed by alternating the sign of the phase difference between the RF and the beam and by tapering from cavity to cavIty the magnItude of the buncher field levels. The former requires choosIng the ri ght phase velocity taper (mix of less than vp=c cavities) and the latter requires the right sizing of the cavity to cavity coupling smiles (irises).
INIROQDUCTIONThis paper discusses the theory of radial RF focusing and presents some examples of Its application to two, portable, radiographic, linear accelerators that have been built f r non-destructive testing. A companion paper describes the system details and performance capabilities.The design of I ight, portable radiographic, linear accelerators differs from the design of accelerators for research. Of primary Importance Is minitnlzir,g the size, weight, and complexity of the accelerator. Good capture eff iciency, good launching, good spectrum, and emittance are of secondary importance. FHowever, wasted power Is wasted welght In power supplies, cooling system, and most Importantly, In the RF source. Even more important is the fact that at X-band, which Is the natural choice for these small accelerators, the maximum power available Is rather low. Hence, any beam which absorbs RF power without reaching full energy (to within about 5%) reduces the ful I energy (and ful penetration) of the x-rays which can be produced. So whi I e high capture Is not Important, it is important to have a sharp demarcation I ine between those electrons which are captured and accelerated to > 95% of full energy, and those which are lost early. Similarly, It wastes RF power to accelerator electrons part away through the accelerator and then lose them radially.