2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-020-02625-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portable imageless navigation system and surgeon’s estimate for accurate evaluation of acetabular cup orientation during total hip arthroplasty in supine position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a previous portable navigation study [ 7 ], difference (mean ± standard deviation) in navigation and conventional groups for cup inclination was 2.8° ± 2.4°. Based on this finding, a sample size of 12 hips in each group was considered necessary to detect a significant difference between groups (ɑ = 0.05, power = 0.8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a previous portable navigation study [ 7 ], difference (mean ± standard deviation) in navigation and conventional groups for cup inclination was 2.8° ± 2.4°. Based on this finding, a sample size of 12 hips in each group was considered necessary to detect a significant difference between groups (ɑ = 0.05, power = 0.8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, of 40 studies, 5 (12%) studies included patients, and 2 (5%) described cadaveric results. Among the clinical studies, there were 2% (1/40) of case series with an average score of 85 out of 100 points (85%) and 16 (16%) case series with an average score of 89 (SD 10.11) out of 100 points (89%) according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist (refer to Multimedia Appendix 3 [ 17 - 19 , 21 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 41 , 45 , 49 ] for the full list). The 2 cadaveric studies also scored high based on Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies scale, with average scores of 85 out of 100 points (85%) and 92 out of 100 points (92%) (refer to Multimedia Appendix 4 for the full list [ 44 , 50 ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This portable system combines the accuracy of image-free computer-based navigation systems with the convenience of traditional alignment techniques. Takada et al [ 19 ] prospectively assessed acetabular cup positioning using the portable image-free navigation system HipAlign and a manual goniometer during a procedure that was performed through a supine anterolateral approach; see Takada et al [ 19 ] for an image of a navigation sensor for a cup impactor. The absolute error of the difference between the CT-measured acetabular cup angle and HipAlign-measured acetabular cup angle was estimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, simpler portable navigation systems have been developed, and their accuracy has been reported. The accuracy of cup placement by various portable navigation systems in the supine position is 2.6°-3.7° for RI and 2.8°-3.8° for RA [10][11][12]. Okamoto et al reported that in DAA-THA, the cup placement rate within ± 5° was 56.6% in the alignment guide group and 72.2% in the portable navigation (Hip Align ® ) group [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%