2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portable, field-based neuroimaging using high-density diffuse optical tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While fMRI has become a gold standard for cognitive neuroimaging, it is contraindicated in subjects with metal implants and cannot be used in many clinical settings, and studies seeking more naturalistic imaging environments. In contrast, functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)‐based methods are portable, suitable for naturalistic imaging, and not contraindicated in subjects with electronic or metal implants (Dashtestani et al, 2018; Dashtestani et al, 2019; Farzam et al, 2017; Fishell et al, 2016; Fishell et al, 2020; Fishell, Burns‐Yocum, Bergonzi, Eggebrecht, & Culver, 2019; Franceschini & Boas, 2004; Khaksari et al, 2019; Liao et al, 2012; Lloyd‐Fox, Blasi, & Elwell, 2010; Morishita et al, 2016; Saliba, Bortfeld, Levitin, & Oghalai, 2016; Salsabilian et al, 2019; Salsabilian et al, 2020). Sparse fNIRS imaging arrays yield poor resolution and low image quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While fMRI has become a gold standard for cognitive neuroimaging, it is contraindicated in subjects with metal implants and cannot be used in many clinical settings, and studies seeking more naturalistic imaging environments. In contrast, functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)‐based methods are portable, suitable for naturalistic imaging, and not contraindicated in subjects with electronic or metal implants (Dashtestani et al, 2018; Dashtestani et al, 2019; Farzam et al, 2017; Fishell et al, 2016; Fishell et al, 2020; Fishell, Burns‐Yocum, Bergonzi, Eggebrecht, & Culver, 2019; Franceschini & Boas, 2004; Khaksari et al, 2019; Liao et al, 2012; Lloyd‐Fox, Blasi, & Elwell, 2010; Morishita et al, 2016; Saliba, Bortfeld, Levitin, & Oghalai, 2016; Salsabilian et al, 2019; Salsabilian et al, 2020). Sparse fNIRS imaging arrays yield poor resolution and low image quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main advantage of using sparse sequences is the net reduction in processing time and computational capacity demands. The suggested approach can facilitate the development of fUS neuroimaging in any setting where dedicated hardware is not available or even in clinical scanners, making this technology more affordable and opening the way to new potential applications based on this imaging modality 3,39 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the recently reported approach showed that recovery of parameters in a multi-wavelength time-resolved data can be achieved without prior instrument calibration [47]. Other notable NIR innovations in instrumental methods for spectral analysis during the review period includes a dual detection channel instrument for NIR time-resolved diffuse optical spectroscopy [48], functional NIR spectroscopy (fNIRS) instruments for high-density diffuse optical tomography [49,50], and other NIR-based sensors [51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Portable Nir Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%