2018 IEEE 61st International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/mwscas.2018.8624013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portable and Low Power Efficient Pre-Fall Detection Methodology

Abstract: Fall in recent years have become a potential threat to elder generation. It occurs because of side effects of medication, lack of physical activities, limited vision, and poor mobility. Looking at the problems faced by people and cost of treatment after falling, it is of high importance to develop a system that will help in detecting the fall before it occurs. Over the years, this has influenced researchers to pursue the development to automatic fall detection system. However, much of existing work achieved a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FMFP: Sensitivity = 97.8% Specificity = 99.1% SMFD: Sensitivity = 98.6% Specificity = 99.3% Works on only one sensor which fails to provide accuracy for different types of falling events. [39] A belt-like wearable sensor based on pre-fall detection system, which uses linear and angular velocity information from motion sensor to classify human fall. Accuracy = 96.63% Sensitivity = 100% Specificity = 95.45%…”
Section: No Error Was Recognized In Laboratory Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FMFP: Sensitivity = 97.8% Specificity = 99.1% SMFD: Sensitivity = 98.6% Specificity = 99.3% Works on only one sensor which fails to provide accuracy for different types of falling events. [39] A belt-like wearable sensor based on pre-fall detection system, which uses linear and angular velocity information from motion sensor to classify human fall. Accuracy = 96.63% Sensitivity = 100% Specificity = 95.45%…”
Section: No Error Was Recognized In Laboratory Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%