2022
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2022.3152451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Port Selection for Fluid Antenna Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more realistic scenario is when only a few ports are observed to reason and deduce the best port by exploiting the spatial correlation among the ports. In [144], this problem was addressed for single-user fluid antenna systems using learning-based methods. How these methods fare for FAMA is, however, not understood and should be properly investigated.…”
Section: E Port Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more realistic scenario is when only a few ports are observed to reason and deduce the best port by exploiting the spatial correlation among the ports. In [144], this problem was addressed for single-user fluid antenna systems using learning-based methods. How these methods fare for FAMA is, however, not understood and should be properly investigated.…”
Section: E Port Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this letter, nevertheless, we assume full knowledge of {g (u,u) k } to simplify our discussion and will study this in future work. Note that such approach was explored for single-user fluid antenna systems in [22].…”
Section: Proposed Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because s-FAMA generally requires a large number of switchable positions (or ports) to exploit the deep fades occurring in narrow regions but acquiring observations at all the ports is infeasible. Similar to [15], this letter leverages deep learning to infer the best port given only a few observations over the ports. Nonetheless, one fundamental difference is that [15] investigated a single-user system while this letter addresses the multiuser s-FAMA network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to [15], this letter leverages deep learning to infer the best port given only a few observations over the ports. Nonetheless, one fundamental difference is that [15] investigated a single-user system while this letter addresses the multiuser s-FAMA network. In particular, [15] attempts to estimate the UE's channel envelopes of all the ports whereas this work's objective is to estimate the average signal-to-interference plus noise ratios (SINRs) over the ports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation