Port Knowledge Risk Management

Handley-Schachler, Morrison

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35121-2_11

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It was establish that after organization has identified the knowledge risks, organization need to take a further assessment on the KR that could affect the organization most and more precisely; the probability that it will occur most and the potential size of the loss need to be identified and analyzed (Durst and Zieba, 2020). Also Handley-Schachler (2020) analyzed four steps used in assessing KRM are knowledge inventory creation; improving learnable knowledge by simplifying of procedures where possible; success planning to that when key persons leave the organization the key knowledge is not lost and lastly far sightness of the knowledge needs in the future. Due to the elementary stage in the field of KRM based on research carried out, there are no well-established models, frameworks and other tools (Durst and Ferenh 2016; Lee et al, 2014; Trkman and Desouza, 2012) to conduct knowledge risk management.…”

Section: Knowledge Risk and Organizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge audit as an important tool in organizational management: A review of literature

Ayinde

Orekoya

Adepeju³

et al. 2021

Business Information Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to review current literature on knowledge management and highlight the importance of knowledge audit in bringing about a holistic knowledge solution to knowledge management. Based on the review of literature on knowledge management, this study points out the role of knowledge audit in solving the challenges in organizations’ tacit and explicit knowledge. Specifically, the paper concentrates on knowledge audit, knowledge risk and international and national standards on knowledge audit processes. The contribution of this study to literature are the suggestions that knowledge risk and international standards procedures could be applied to knowledge audit. The important conclusion of this paper is that knowledge risk management has not been fully explored in the study of knowledge audit. The paper addresses the research question of what organizations must embark on in the process of knowledge audit. The paper attempts to provide answer to the question by highlighting the importance of knowledge audit and the reasons why organizations carry out knowledge audit, and also the existing knowledge audit frameworks and methodologies.

show abstract