Port co-opetition in concept and practice

Song, Dong-Wook

doi:10.1080/0308883032000051612

Cited by 216 publications

(110 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Gateways, the nodal points through which intercontinental containers are transhipped onto continental axes, could become hub port cities as a result of such influences (Fleming and Hayuth, 1994). Due to these globalization trends, countries 6 and regions are competing in one (and only one) global market, which has resulted in a dramatic increase of competition in international trade (Song, 2003). As seen in Table 1, changing maritime systems have led to competition as well as co-operation in the port industry.…”

Section: Global Trendmentioning

confidence: 99%

A tale of Asia’s world ports: The spatial evolution in global hub port cities

Lee¹,

Song²,

Ducruet³

2008

Geoforum

Self Cite

176

134

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Globalization and transport revolution, logistics integration, and the consequent expansion of port area and hinterland in the maritime industry have redefined the functional role of ports in supply chains and have generated a new pattern of freight distribution. This phenomenon again requires a new approach towards port development and related urban planning. Such changes have inevitably influenced the spatial structure of hub port cities.As existing models on spatial and functional evolution of ports and cities are mainly derived from European and American cases, this paper attempts to introduce evidence from an Asian perspective, focusing on the particular case of global hub port cities such as Hong Kong and Singapore.

show abstract

Section: Global Trendmentioning

confidence: 99%

A tale of Asia’s world ports: The spatial evolution in global hub port cities

Lee¹,

Song²,

Ducruet³

2008

Geoforum

Self Cite

176

134

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The attempt to increase the common market power compared with other competitors or in front of customers is a characteristic of the co-opetition approach. Thus, this paper is thematically close to that of Song (2003).…”

Section: Analysis Of B/n's "Co-opetition"mentioning

confidence: 64%

“…In a variable-sum game structure, firm interdependence is based on "partially convergent interfirm interests". Song (2003) explains the significance of co-opetition in the port industry with the rationalization efforts of the preceding decade. Many port operators who previously ran only their local business now extend their business to the regional or global scale.…”

Section: Analysis Of B/n's "Co-opetition"mentioning

confidence: 99%

Literature Overview on the Field of Co-opetition

Stein

2010

Business: Theory and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Co-opetition is a perspective on business relationships which highlights the ambivalence of competition and cooperation. Game theory is regarded as the mathematical tool for solving co-opetition related problems. The major step for introducing "co-opetition" into public discussion and economic research has been made by Brandenburger and Nalebuff in 1996. However they target a non-professional readership. A multitude of publications has followed, where the authors mostly focus on specific aspects of the problem and investigate particular industries. This paper gives a comprehensive literature overview on the field of co-opetition.Keywords: co-opetition, game theory, Nalebuff and Brandenburger's book "Co-opetition", overview and analysis of the literature on the field of co-opetition. LITERATūROS APIE bENDRADARbIAVImU gRįSTą KONKURENCIją APžVALgA Harald D. SteinVilniaus Gedimino technikos universitetas, Saulėtekio al. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lietuva El. paštas hd.stein@web.de Įteikta 2010-03-23; priimta 2010-05-03 Santrauka. Bendradarbiavimu grįsta konkurencija yra verslo santykių perspektyva, kuri pabrėžia konkurencijos ir bendradarbiavimo dvilypumą. Žaidimų teorija laikoma matematinė priemonė spręsti problemas, susijusias su bendradarbiavimu grįsta konkurencija. Viešas diskusijas ir ekonominius tyrimus apie bendradarbiavimu grįstą konkurenciją pradėjo Brandenburger ir Nalebuff 1996 m. Tačiau jų darbai skirti ne specialistams. Daugumoje publikacijų šia tema dėmesys skiriamas konkretiems problemos aspektams ir nagrinėjamos atskiros pramonės šakos. Šiame straipsnyje pateikiama išsami literatūros apie bendradarbiavimu grįstą konkurenciją apžvalga.Reikšminiai žodžiai: bendradarbiavimu grįsta konkurencija, žaidimų teorija, Nalebuff ir Brandenburger knyga "Bendradarbiavimu grįsta konkurencija", apžvalga ir literatūros apie bendradarbiavimu grįstą konkurenciją analizė.

show abstract

“…Shippers and consignees increasingly require the responsibility for all logistic activities to be assumed by global supply chain specialists and logistics integration has become a common strategy of transport providers (Frankel 1999). Robinson (2002) argues that this new paradigm ports and terminals being components of global supply chains, although enticing, is still relatively uncommon (Song andPanayides 2008, Tongzon, Chang andLee 2009). Although ports clearly have a role to play in global supply chains, they are often unable to influence or affect chain competitiveness beyond their own boundaries (Carbone and de Martino 2003).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The development of supply chain networks imposes a set of challenges for ports and terminal operators (Notteboom 2008, Heaver, Meersman and van de Voorde 2001, Song 2003. Supply chain management in fact becomes an integral part of port management, and therefore it becomes increasingly important to assess priorities in the management of container terminal process effectiveness (Brooks and Schellinck 2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%