“…Most attention has focused on promising SIB cathode candidates, such as Prussian blue analogs, , transition-metal chalcogenides, − and Na + superionic conductor (NASICON) compounds. − Among various cathode materials for SIBs, NASICON-based electrode materials provoke tremendous interest and extensive investigation ascribing to their open three-dimensional (3D) ion channel, great structural stability, and excellent thermal stability. − As a member of the NASION-type materials, Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 2 O 2–2 x F 1+2 x (NVPOF, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1) has emerged as a promising polyanionic compound for SIBs on account of its high theoretical specific capacity (130 mA h g –1 ), considerable average working voltage (∼3.8 V), and thereby a high energy density of ca. ∼500 W h kg –1 . ,− However, NVPOF has obvious disadvantages of intrinsically poor electronic conductivity (∼10 –12 S cm –1 ) and suppressed sodium-ion diffusion induced by the presence of highly electronegative fluorine, − which result in unsatisfactory rate capability and cycling stability. In view of inferior electron transport kinetics for the NVPOF cathode, extensive research efforts have focused on strategies of interfacial engineering, ,, ion doping, − composite architecture, , and nanostructural engineering , to achieve optimized electrochemical performances for NVPOF-based cathodes.…”