“…Numerous strategies have been attempted to enhance the practical C s values of TMOs by increasing the electrical conductivity and redox behavior, comprising the synthesis of BTMOs/mixed metal oxides/ternary metal oxides, controlling the size and morphologies, and the preparation of composites with highly conductive materials. ,,− Recently, BTMOs that showed enhanced pseudocapacitive performance than the corresponding single-component oxides, including Ni–Co, Sr–Cu, Mn–Fe, and Mn–Cu oxides, have attracted much attention. ,,, This can be attributed that the binary metal ions with multiple oxidation states in BTMOs can exhibit improved Faradaic redox reactions and high electrical conductivity, which is beneficial to obtain high C s and E d . , Even if the reported BTMOs can deliver high C s compared to the single-component oxides prepared under similar experimental conditions, the C s values of these BTMOs are significantly lower compared to the theoretical C s values of single-component oxides. For example, Yuan et al prepared Ru–Cr-based BTMOs that delivered the C s only 148 F/g, which is very low compared to the theoretical C s of RuO 2 (1400–200 F/g) and Cr 3 O 4 (3560 F/g). , In another report, Zhu et al synthesized Mn–Cu-based BTMOs, which showed the C s of only 422 F/g . The C s values of these Mn–Cu-based BTMOs are much lower compared to those of the reported pristine Mn-oxides and Cu oxides. ,, Since BTMOs exhibited much improved Faradaic redox behavior than TMOs, the low C s values of them might be due to their low conductivities.…”