2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.03.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porous graphene supported Pt catalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More precisely, MWCNTs act as conducting bridges between the FGLs while FGLs act as spacer between CNTs increasing thus the number of available catalyst particles for ORR. This conclusion comforts the trend reported in literature, showing that the reactant diffusion in graphene containing layer can be improved by using porous graphene [35] or composite [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…More precisely, MWCNTs act as conducting bridges between the FGLs while FGLs act as spacer between CNTs increasing thus the number of available catalyst particles for ORR. This conclusion comforts the trend reported in literature, showing that the reactant diffusion in graphene containing layer can be improved by using porous graphene [35] or composite [36].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…He et al (2014) showed that the sulfonated reduced GO provides a great potential for the PEMFC catalyst material due to the enhanced activity and durability . Cheng et al (2014) also found that the porous graphene nanosheet significantly improved the mass diffusion pathways and electrochemical surface area, resulting in the enhanced electrochemical reaction . Jafri et al (2015) reported that the N 2 ‐doped graphene enhances the ORR to potentially serve as a new PEMFC catalyst .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As scan was done before 0.2 V, the plateau shows no affect towards the current generated from the secondary hydrogen evolution reaction or the mixed region. Cheng et al reported Pt on porous graphene showed 1.8 times more mass activity than Pt/C [40]. The calculated mass and specific activities at 0.6 V for Pt/PENT were 2.1 and 1.3 times higher compared to Pt/C respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%