2018
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201803433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porous‐Carbon‐Confined Formation of Monodisperse Iron Nanoparticle Yolks toward Versatile Nanoreactors for Metal Extraction

Abstract: All-in-one architectures in which uniform nanoscale zero-valent iron nanoparticles are wrapped in hollow porous carbon shells are highly desirable for environmental applications such as wastewater treatment and for use as catalysts, but their preparation remains a significant challenge. Herein, a spatially confined strategy for the in situ preparation of uniform Fe @mC (mC=micro/mesoporous carbon) yolk-shell nanospheres, in which the iron nanoparticles are encapsulated in thin, porous carbon shells, is reporte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One promising approach to address the aforementioned drawbacks and improve the electrocatalytic performance is utilization of the nanostructured zerovalent iron because of the low price, excellent electron-donating capability, large specific area, and high reduction capacity. Prior to modulating the electrocatalytic capability, a critical issue needs to be solved: how to avoid the aggregation of nanostructured iron as the natural magnetic property and high surface energy hinder the surface-active sites. For this purpose, several strategies have been explored to host nanostructured iron with conductive sites, such as graphene, hollow carbon nanoshell, and porous carbon matrix. Zhang’s group anchored the iron nanoparticles in the mesoporous carbon framework by the nanocasting approach and demonstrated the electrocatalytic denitrification capability with a maximum removal capacity of 315 mg N/g Fe and decent nitrogen selectivity of 74% …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One promising approach to address the aforementioned drawbacks and improve the electrocatalytic performance is utilization of the nanostructured zerovalent iron because of the low price, excellent electron-donating capability, large specific area, and high reduction capacity. Prior to modulating the electrocatalytic capability, a critical issue needs to be solved: how to avoid the aggregation of nanostructured iron as the natural magnetic property and high surface energy hinder the surface-active sites. For this purpose, several strategies have been explored to host nanostructured iron with conductive sites, such as graphene, hollow carbon nanoshell, and porous carbon matrix. Zhang’s group anchored the iron nanoparticles in the mesoporous carbon framework by the nanocasting approach and demonstrated the electrocatalytic denitrification capability with a maximum removal capacity of 315 mg N/g Fe and decent nitrogen selectivity of 74% …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon nanospheres were obtained from carbonization of resorcinol/formaldehyde (RF) resin polymer spheres, which were synthesized according to a previous report [ 50 ]. The SiO 2 @carbon core-shell nanospheres were synthesized by a one-pot sol-gel approach [ 51 ]. Typically, 6.92 mL of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were added in a solution containing 20 mL of deionized water, 140 mL of absolute ethanol and 6 mL of aqueous ammonia.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniform Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles were prepared based on the solvothermal synthesis strategy reported previously. 31 Typically, FeCl 3 •6H 2 O (3.25 g) and trisodium citrate (1.3 g) were dissolved in ethylene glycol (100 mL) with agitation and ultrasonication at room temperature to obtain a uniform and transparent yellow solution. Subsequently, sodium acetate (NaAc, 6.0 g) was added to the above solution.…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25−27 The introduction of bridged organic groups can be considered in which some Si−O−Si bonds in mesoporous silica materials are replaced by Si−R−Si bonds (R is the bridged organic group). 31 Compared with traditional organic modification, organic groups are usually anchored on the mesoporous surface, which reduces the encapsulation and diffusion of guest molecules by steric hindrance. Organic functional groups can combine with more than two silicon atoms so that they exist not only as functional groups but also as crosslinking agents in the structure of rigid hybrid organic− inorganic frameworks.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation