2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porosity testing methods for the quality assessment of selective laser melted parts

Abstract: This study focuses on the comparison of porosity testing methods for the quality assessment of selective laser melted parts. Porosity is regarded as important quality indicator in metal additive manufacturing. Various destructive and non-destructive testing methods are compared, ranging from global to local observation techniques and from quick low-cost to expensive time-consuming analyses. Forty test specimens were produced using five varying control factors. The experimental results show that Archimedes and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…UIT can introduce the compressive stress into the layer, and hence reduce the tensile stress. Figure 4a shows that there are many large and irregular incomplete fusion defects in the SLM sample, due to the inappropriate hatch spacing [16] (used on purpose to generate defects). However, since UIT is applied after depositing every two layers, some small defects are basically eliminated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UIT can introduce the compressive stress into the layer, and hence reduce the tensile stress. Figure 4a shows that there are many large and irregular incomplete fusion defects in the SLM sample, due to the inappropriate hatch spacing [16] (used on purpose to generate defects). However, since UIT is applied after depositing every two layers, some small defects are basically eliminated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various non‐destructive testing (NDT) methods, such as Archimedes method, gas pycnometry, and X‐ray computed tomography (CT), have been utilized to characterize defects. Archimedes method and gas pycnometry are not capable of quantitatively providing information on the size, location, or distribution of the defects . On the other hand, the volume, location, shape, and distribution of the defects in 3D space can be obtained via X‐ray CT.…”
Section: Effect Of Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archimedes method and gas pycnometry are not capable of quantitatively providing information on the size, location, or distribution of the defects. 20,21 On the other hand, the volume, location, shape, and distribution of the defects in 3D space can be obtained via X-ray CT. However, the CT process is relatively expensive and defects due to LOF containing unmelted powder particles may not be fully detectable by CT. A simple destructive method, such as microscopic cross-section analysis performed on AM parts using optical microscopy or scanning electron microscopy (SEM), may be beneficial in terms of achieving high resolution and accuracy in measuring size, shape, and location of the microscopic defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 A possible nondestructive test method to identify and characterize the process-induced porosity is the use of Xray computed tomography (CT). The method is widely used for different AM materials such as aluminum [16][17][18] and titanium alloys 19,20 for density measurements and characterization of pores and cracks. However, steels are challenging for X-ray applications due to their high density, high absorption coefficient, and the effect of beam hardening, causing artifacts and noise in the CT data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%