2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porosity characterization of aerogels using positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positron lifetime, number of annihilation photons, and electron momentum are measured by different experimental techniques, and used to deduce different porosity characteristics (Schultz and Lynn, 1988;Puska and Nieminen, 1994). Lately Mincov et al (2004) utilized positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS) for non-destructive characterization of porosity in aerogels.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The positron lifetime, number of annihilation photons, and electron momentum are measured by different experimental techniques, and used to deduce different porosity characteristics (Schultz and Lynn, 1988;Puska and Nieminen, 1994). Lately Mincov et al (2004) utilized positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS) for non-destructive characterization of porosity in aerogels.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30] Ueno et al [31] utilized PALS to quantify the <10 Å pores within the mesoporous silica SBA-15, linking selectivity of benzene to toluene to this previously unreliably measured property. They also utilized N 2 adsorption to measure mesopore (>20 Å ) size of the same material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37,38 Additionally, it has been successfully applied in silica aerogels. 39 A comprehensive understanding of the nanoporous structure of nano-SCEs was acquired by combining the results of PALS with SEM, TEM, and N 2 adsorption/desorption measurements. All the PALS results are presented in the Supporting Information.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%