2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00663.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poroelastic Loading of an Aquifer Due to Upstream Dam Releases

Abstract: Short-term changes in the hydraulic head of surface water bodies are known to influence the shallow response of hydraulically connected groundwaters. Associated with these fluctuations is the physical increase in stream water creating a mechanical load on the ground surface. This load is supported by the geologic materials (sediment or rock) and the pore fluid contained within the pores. Changes in this surface load have a direct effect on the total stress of the aquifer causing either a change in effective st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the BAS, a value of 1.5 × 10 −4  m 2 /s for D derived from K v and S s determined by inverse modelling 20 , suggests that hydraulic penetration of the diurnal tidal signal would be less than 10 m; the spring-neap tidal signal should not penetrate beyond a few tens of metres. Therefore we interpret the undamped periodic oscillations at up to 212 m depth as the fluid pressure changes in this coastal, confined and unconsolidated aquifer due to mechanical loading and unloading of the aquifer by tidal water movements above the aquifer surface, commensurate with analytical treatments 21–23 .
Figure 2Amplitudes of the tidal and atmospheric signals and groundwater responses at Gabura and Laksmipur. Top: amplitude versus frequency for ( a ) the Chittagong tide and ( b – d ) the groundwater heads at GbPZ67, GbPZ116 and GbPZ212 respectively, 1 st June 2013 to 31 st May 2014, showing the principal solar-lunar tidal components 17 O 1 , K 1 , N 2 , M 2 and S 2 , and additional minor components (see text).
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For the BAS, a value of 1.5 × 10 −4  m 2 /s for D derived from K v and S s determined by inverse modelling 20 , suggests that hydraulic penetration of the diurnal tidal signal would be less than 10 m; the spring-neap tidal signal should not penetrate beyond a few tens of metres. Therefore we interpret the undamped periodic oscillations at up to 212 m depth as the fluid pressure changes in this coastal, confined and unconsolidated aquifer due to mechanical loading and unloading of the aquifer by tidal water movements above the aquifer surface, commensurate with analytical treatments 21–23 .
Figure 2Amplitudes of the tidal and atmospheric signals and groundwater responses at Gabura and Laksmipur. Top: amplitude versus frequency for ( a ) the Chittagong tide and ( b – d ) the groundwater heads at GbPZ67, GbPZ116 and GbPZ212 respectively, 1 st June 2013 to 31 st May 2014, showing the principal solar-lunar tidal components 17 O 1 , K 1 , N 2 , M 2 and S 2 , and additional minor components (see text).
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Small responses (a few mm or less) to precipitation loading (e.g., Rasmussen and Mote 2007) have been observed, but had no influence on the analyses. Water‐level responses to stream‐stage loading (e.g., Boutt 2010) have also been observed, but were negligible during the period of the analyses.…”
Section: Field Site Overviewmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Deformation and flow induced by the total stress change is purely vertical, occurring only in the lower part of the aquifer. The total stress change in this study is referred to the temporal change in mechanical load on the aquifer induced by, for example, stream stage fluctuations [23,24] , seasonal changes of soil moisture storage [25,26] , sedimentation [10] or erosion [8] of the aquifer surface etc.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%