1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0939-6411(97)00169-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore structure and surface area of mannitol powder, granules and tablets determined with mercury porosimetry and nitrogen adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the increase in powder bed porosity allows particle-particle interactions of greater extent during the subsequent stage of compression, resulting in higher tabletability (Westermarck et al, 1998). Additionally, the lower relative degrees of crystallinity of mannitols lyophilised from lower concentrations in comparison to mannitols lyophilised from higher concentrations (Figure 6c) could be another reason for the higher tensile strengths for tablets made from mannitols lyophilised from lower concentrations.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the increase in powder bed porosity allows particle-particle interactions of greater extent during the subsequent stage of compression, resulting in higher tabletability (Westermarck et al, 1998). Additionally, the lower relative degrees of crystallinity of mannitols lyophilised from lower concentrations in comparison to mannitols lyophilised from higher concentrations (Figure 6c) could be another reason for the higher tensile strengths for tablets made from mannitols lyophilised from lower concentrations.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase identification with the burnout atmosphere was performed by X-ray diffractometry (XRD, Rigaku Co., D/MAX-III, Japan). Pore size and distribution of MLCCs after the burnout process was measured by porosimetry (Autoscan-25, 60, Quantachrome Corp., Syosset, NY, USA), from which the cumulative pore surface area of MLCCs is compared [11][12][13]. The burnout microstructure in the fracture surface was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S2700, Hitachi, Japan).…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it can be argued that pore shape and structure will be determined by the mercury intrusion/extrusion behaviors (hysteresis behavior) because the amount of mercury retained by the sample will be influenced by a combination of at least two factors: the shape of the pores and the value of the contact angle [20]. Many reports have been offered to account for the experimental observation that mercury extrusion curves do not overlap intrusion curves [11,12,[21][22][23]. Three explanations appear to be favored by different groups in the literature: (1) the ink-bottle pore assumption [11,12], (2) network effects [21,22], and (3) the pore potential theory [23].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the pore volume (which is related to the cell wall) is crucial for understanding the mechanical properties of wood. This methodology has been used to evaluate cement-based materials (Kaufmann 2010), chemical materials (Westermarck et al 1998), and wood (Chang et al 2011). Kojiro et al (2010) studied mesopores in the cell wall of dry wood using nitrogen gas adsorption and discovered that the mesopore volume barely changed with the elevation of pretreatment temperatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%