2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore structure and its impact on CH4 adsorption capacity and flow capability of bituminous and subbituminous coals from Northeast China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
370
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 577 publications
(385 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
14
370
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Langmuir volumes of the shale samples had a positive relationship with fractal dimension (Figure 14), which was consistent with many previous studies of coal and shale [13,14,37,45]. The higher fractal dimension values represented a rough and irregular surface, which provided more adsorption sites and resulted in higher adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Effects Of Fractal Dimension On the Adsorption Capacity Of Ssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Langmuir volumes of the shale samples had a positive relationship with fractal dimension (Figure 14), which was consistent with many previous studies of coal and shale [13,14,37,45]. The higher fractal dimension values represented a rough and irregular surface, which provided more adsorption sites and resulted in higher adsorption capacity.…”
Section: Effects Of Fractal Dimension On the Adsorption Capacity Of Ssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mandelbrot first proposed fractal concepts and geometry for evaluating the complex shapes of objects found in nature [35] and the geometry of coal or shale pores is a typical example of such shapes. Many previous studies have used fractal theory to evaluate the pore heterogeneity of shale, coal, or sandstone [11][12][13][36][37][38][39]. Fractal dimension D is frequently used as a parameter to quantitatively characterize the heterogeneous pore structure of shale [40].…”
Section: Organic Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, coal is characterized as a dual-pore system [6] including the matrix porosity consisting of micropores/ mesopores in the coal matrix (i.e., the porous material region) and the fracture porosity composed of nonuniformly distributed macropores and microfractures (i.e., the free flow region) [7]. The adsorption processes of methane in the reservoir can be divided into two parts: Enter the irregular macropore-microfractures system by advection-diffusion; diffuse in the nanopore network of a matrix, then adsorbed on the interior surface of pores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the coal gas adsorption process, in general, it is considered as a physisorption process because the molecular forces involved are normally of the Van der Waals type [2,7]. Many studies, including both experiment and numerical simulation, have focused on (isothermal) adsorption equilibrium without concerning the intermediate states or time in recent years [11,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various pore characterization techniques have been applied to quantify the pore structures from total porosity, pore volume, pore size distribution (PSD), SSA, and so on [2,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. These include low-pressure gas (N 2 /CO 2 ) adsorption/desorption techniques [9][10][11][12], high-pressure mercury intrusion porosimetery (MIP) [12][13][14], ultra/small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) [15,16], focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy [17], field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy [18], nuclear magnetic resonance [19,20], and X-ray computed tomography [17,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%