2016
DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2015037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Space Connectivity and the Transport Properties of Rocks

Abstract: -Pore connectivity is likely one of the most important factors affecting the permeability of reservoir rocks. Furthermore, connectivity effects are not restricted to materials approaching a percolation transition but can continuously and gradually occur in rocks undergoing geological processes such as mechanical and chemical diagenesis. In this study, we compiled sets of published measurements of porosity, permeability and formation factor, performed in samples of unconsolidated granular aggregates, in which c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of liquid permeability, the validity of this generalization was indeed confirmed by comparing the inferred model to experimental rock data [Bernabé et al, 2010[Bernabé et al, , 2011[Bernabé et al, , 2015a. This approach was also successfully applied to other transport properties Bernabé et al, 2015b;Li et al, 2015].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of liquid permeability, the validity of this generalization was indeed confirmed by comparing the inferred model to experimental rock data [Bernabé et al, 2010[Bernabé et al, , 2011[Bernabé et al, , 2015a. This approach was also successfully applied to other transport properties Bernabé et al, 2015b;Li et al, 2015].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…For example, we argued that the model and data in Figure correspond to two slightly different types of materials. We applied our model to unconsolidated glass beads, while Klinkenberg [] measured k app in consolidated granular media (fritted glass filters and sandstones), which certainly experienced substantial reductions in connectivity and augmentations of pore‐scale heterogeneity (see Bernabé et al [] for an analysis of fritted glass materials and Fontainebleau sandstone). Similarly, the underestimation of the slopes of the k app versus 1/< p > curves shown in Figure can be partially due to our using a slightly overestimated r H value corresponding to idealized pores with circular cross section, which may be a poor representation of the highly complex, cross‐sectional shapes of the pore‐throats in rocks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical approximations of the functions C k (σ) and β(σ) were determined by Bernabé et al [2010Bernabé et al [ , 2011 in pipe networks constructed using the same procedures as in the present study. It is worth noting that equation (5) was found to hold satisfactorily in relatively simple porous materials such as unconsolidated granular aggregates, sintered glass beads, and clay free sandstones [Bernabé et al, 2015]. In agreement with equation (5), the series of simulations described in section 4.3 (performed using variable R and fixed values of (z À z c ), σ and R/l) yielded d<(X i À <X i >) 2 >/ dt = 2D L ∝k m L = 2 (Figure 9) and d<(Y i À <Y i >) 2 >/dt ≈ d<(Z i À <Z i >) 2 >/dt = 2D T ∝k m T = 2 ¼ ffiffi ffi k p (Figure 10).…”
Section: Relationships Of the Dispersion Coefficients To Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The realizations had equal linear dimensions in the three space directions (i.e., overall cubic shape). The SC and FCC networks contained 41,472 branches, while there were 46,656 in the BCC cells.The hydraulic radius, i.e., twice the ratio of the total volume to total surface area of the pipes in the network, is a convenient characteristic length scale controlling permeability (one important advantage is that the hydraulic radius is physically measurable in real porous media; for a more detailed discussion see Bernabé et al [, , ]). In most of the networks investigated here, we fixed the network hydraulic radius R to 40 · 10 −6 m, although values as low as 20 · 10 −6 m and as high as 120 · 10 −6 m were also considered.…”
Section: Network Simulation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%