2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.11.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore size and shape in mortar by thermoporometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
106
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sun's experimental data show that λ is usually between 0.1 and 0.5 for cement-based materials (Sun, 2010b). The melting point is always higher than the freezing point for the same pores.…”
Section: Ice Formation and Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Sun's experimental data show that λ is usually between 0.1 and 0.5 for cement-based materials (Sun, 2010b). The melting point is always higher than the freezing point for the same pores.…”
Section: Ice Formation and Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15)) and melting curve (Eq. (16)) are not the same, because the freezing point is usually controlled by the size of pore entry while the melting point is by that of pore body (Sun, 2010b), and the pore shape factor λ can be defined as:…”
Section: Ice Formation and Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of other probe liquids such as cyclohexane or decane as non-reactive solvents and the tracking of a solid-solid phase transition could allow evaluating a wider range of pores, with a higher sensitivity of the experiment [27,49].…”
Section: Comparison Between the Different Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not only the ranges of pore sizes are different, also the specific structural features measured vary between techniques. Thus, MIP evaluates the pore entrance size [12], whereas the gas adsorption technique allows measuring both pore size and pore entrance size, using the adsorption and desorption curves respectively [20,27]. TPM allows the determination of the size of the cavity of the pore during the melting cycle and the pore entrance size during the freezing cycle [21,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%