2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore-scale simulation of shale gas production considering the adsorption effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kn ‐related effective viscosity and slip boundary condition were introduced to account for the confinement effect (Guo et al, ; Q. Li et al, ). Later, by modifying the slip boundary condition and introducing the regularization procedure, it was also used to simulate gas flow in nanoporous media (Landry et al, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhao et al, ). In this paper, the LB model is used to simulate gas flow in different nanoscale pore geometries to analyze the viscous dissipation and verify the accuracy of different apparent permeability calculation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kn ‐related effective viscosity and slip boundary condition were introduced to account for the confinement effect (Guo et al, ; Q. Li et al, ). Later, by modifying the slip boundary condition and introducing the regularization procedure, it was also used to simulate gas flow in nanoporous media (Landry et al, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhao et al, ; Zhao et al, ). In this paper, the LB model is used to simulate gas flow in different nanoscale pore geometries to analyze the viscous dissipation and verify the accuracy of different apparent permeability calculation models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To simulate fluid flow in real pore structures, different pore‐scale simulation methods can be used, including the lattice Boltzmann method (LBM), traditional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) method based on Navier‐Stokes (N‐S) equations (Prodanović & Bryant, ; Raeini et al, ), dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) method (Groot & Warren, ), and smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method (Tartakovsky & Meakin, ). Because of its compelling advantages such as the simplicity in coding, dealing with the complex solid boundaries and parallelizing, LBM has become a very popular CFD method in many areas, such as multiphase and multicomponent flow (Chen et al, ; Liu et al, ; Martys & Chen, ; Zhang et al, ), reactive flow (Jiang & Tsuji, ; Kang et al, ), microscale and nanoscale flow (Zhao et al, ). There are different multiphase flow LB models (Huang et al, ), including the color‐gradient model (Ba et al, ; Gunstensen et al, ; Liu et al, ), pseudo‐potential model (Shan & Chen, ; Sukop, ), free‐energy model (Swift et al, ), and mean‐field model (He et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MD simulations, the fluid behaviour is described by the motion of the individual particles interacting with each other via intermolecular potentials (Koplik and Banavar 1995). As a result, it is only suitable to simulate fluid behaviours at the nanoscale owing to the limitation of computation cost (Zhao et al 2016). LBM, as an intermediate method between continuum and atomistic simulations, is considered to have tremendous potential for simulating the fluid flow at the meso-scale, and detailed information on it has been presented in Sect.…”
Section: Lb-md Multiscale Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%