2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore-scale analysis of formation damage; A review of existing digital and analytical approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another consideration is formation damage, which is one of the most difficult issues that a reservoir faces over its existence [25]. Pressure fluctuations, pore blockages and reduced production rates may be caused by the phenomena, leading to a decline in oil recovery [26].…”
Section: The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves In Petroleum Reservoirs To Impro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another consideration is formation damage, which is one of the most difficult issues that a reservoir faces over its existence [25]. Pressure fluctuations, pore blockages and reduced production rates may be caused by the phenomena, leading to a decline in oil recovery [26].…”
Section: The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves In Petroleum Reservoirs To Impro...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the petrophysical properties of high-permeability and high-porosity formations are less affected by the negative impacts of CO 2 –brine–rock interactions, as flow channels with larger diameters are less likely to be plugged by precipitated salts, detached fines, and minerals. Therefore, taking some measures, such as hydraulic fracturing, acidizing, or CO 2 injection into reservoir sections with better qualities would be required to increase the injectivity of CO 2 in low-permeability reservoirs. , Note that these measures cannot have a positive impact on the injectivity of formations in case they are not properly adopted. For instance, by analyzing the deployment challenges experienced in three CCS field projects, Huerta et al highlighted that, despite benefiting from the required technologies for increasing the injectivity of wellbores (such as hydraulic fracturing), the insufficient permeability can result in a costly and complicated CO 2 injection design, forced abandonment, and doubt on the capability of the formation for commercial CO 2 storage.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Injectivity Of Co2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Permeability decline due to fines migration is one of the most common reasons for injectivity impairment and is commonly caused by kaolinite, quartz, microcline, muscovite, illite, chlorite, and silt clays. ,,− The related short-term risk of fines migration is lowest in quartz-rich sandstones and is highest in calcite cemented facies. ,, It generally increases due to the presence of impurities.…”
Section: Factors Affecting the Injectivity Of Co2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bridging particles' size distribution in RDF can be optimised using thin-section analysis, based on the diameter of the micropore structure and its arrangement. Contrary to the report of Rezaeizadeh et al [78] that thin-section analysis is primarily utilised in preparing for other analytical techniques, in two separate studies He and Stephen [73] carried out research on the selection of optimal sealing particle size arrangement in RDFs and permeability reduction, while Liang et al [79] conducted research on the quantification of permeability reduction caused by the crosslinked gel in a tight gas-producing formation. These two studies show that thinsection analysis can be used for an optimised FDM/FDC technology.…”
Section: Commonly Used Microscopic Characterisation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%