2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021gl093564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Pressure Threshold and Fault Slip Potential for Induced Earthquakes in the Dallas‐Fort Worth Area of North Central Texas

Abstract: It is well established that the increase in seismicity in the Fort Worth Basin (FWB) from 2008 through its peak in 2015, and continuing recently at far lower magnitudes and rates, was caused by deep disposal of oilfield wastewater (SWD) associated with development and production of the Barnett Shale (Figures 1 and 2) (

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Temporal evolution of Δ P p experienced by each fault (left axis) shown with associated EQ sequences (right axis) and the modeled Δ P p at sequence onset denoted by dashed line for (b) NM1, (c) NM2, (d) CMEZ1, (e) CMEZ2, and (f) CMEZ3. Gray shaded area is Δ P p experienced by seismogenic basement‐rooted faults in the Fort Worth Basin (Hennings, Nicot, et al., 2021). Sequences NM1 and NM2 are shown with earthquakes from both TexNet and New Mexico Tech earthquake catalogs without duplicate events removed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Temporal evolution of Δ P p experienced by each fault (left axis) shown with associated EQ sequences (right axis) and the modeled Δ P p at sequence onset denoted by dashed line for (b) NM1, (c) NM2, (d) CMEZ1, (e) CMEZ2, and (f) CMEZ3. Gray shaded area is Δ P p experienced by seismogenic basement‐rooted faults in the Fort Worth Basin (Hennings, Nicot, et al., 2021). Sequences NM1 and NM2 are shown with earthquakes from both TexNet and New Mexico Tech earthquake catalogs without duplicate events removed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High permeability along critically stressed faults or fracture networks allowing for transmission of fluids or pressure (Townend & Zoback, 2000) to greater distance could also play a role in abundant seismicity in the CMEZ area. This phenomenon was proposed by Gao et al (2021) and Hennings, Nicot, et al (2021) as operative in the Fort Worth Basin allowing systems of critically stressed normal faults to transmit ΔP p up to 40 km from areas of significant injection to faults that became seismogenic. Given that the geomodel reflects the rock matrix, even when the permeability field in the flow model is adjusted globally using injectivity data, fault and fracture permeability conduits could locally play a role in far-field fluid and pressure migration.…”
Section: Pore Pressure Evolution Fault Stability and Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analogous earthquake-triggering in crystalline basement due to produced saltwater injection in the Ellenberger limestone which, like the Arbuckle, sits directly on basement, has been observed in the Dallas/Ft. Worth area of northeast Texas ( 20 ). The same is true in the cases of the Decatur CO 2 injection project in the Illinois Basin ( 21 ) and the Quest CO 2 injection project in Alberta ( 22 ).…”
Section: The Challenges Of Large-scale Geologic Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rock criticality values distribute in a broad range between 0.001 MPa and approximately 3 MPa for the first site and between 0.001 MPa and approximately 1 MPa for the second, with the upper bounds being several orders of magnitude larger than the lower bounds. In the Fort Worth Basin, USA, the critical fluid pressure change to reactivate earthquake sequences was reported to be characterised by a positively skewed distribution ranging between 0 and 1 MPa with a mean of around 0.05 MPa (Hennings et al 2021). This different shape of magnitude distribution of critical values to trigger seismicity may be explained by the seismic event depth considered, and the difference and heterogeneity in fracture attributes and stress conditions at different field sites.…”
Section: Implications Of Fracture Criticality For the Seismotectonic ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Langenbruch et al (2018) forecasted the likelihood of damage inducing earthquakes in both space and time using a hybrid physical-statistical model, which involved the evaluation of pore pressure change by a regional hydrogeologic model, and analysis of spatial variability of the seismogenic state. Hennings et al (2021) integrated the pore pressure change derived from hydrogeological modelling, earthquake catalogues, and probabilistic fault slip potential analysis to investigate relationships between earthquake sequences and the spatiotemporal association with oilfield wastewater disposal activities. In addition, integration of geomechanical analysis and microseismic observations has been used for various evaluation purposes, such as to estimate the fracture pressure to ensure CO 2 storage reservoir integrity (Goertz-Allmann et al 2014), and to map seismically active regional fault-containing corridors (Weir et al 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%