2020
DOI: 10.20944/preprints202011.0028.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Pressure Analysis for Distinguishing Earthquakes Induced by CO2 Injection from Natural Earthquakes

Abstract: It is important to distinguish between natural earthquakes and those induced by CO2 injection at carbon capture and storage sites. For example, the 2004 Mw 6.8 Chuetsu earthquake occurred close to the Nagaoka CO2 storage site during gas injection, but we could not quantify whether the earthquake was due to CO2 injection or not. Here we simulated changes of pore pressure during CO2 injection at the Nagaoka site and compared them with estimated natural seasonal fluctuations of pore pressure due to rainfall and s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This experiment demonstrates that our monitoring system can reveal temporal variations of pore pressure in the geothermal reservoirs. Because the pore pressure is related to the seismicity 7 , we will be able to use this monitoring system for safe reservoir managements in geothermal power.
Figure 8 Monitoring results and geothermal operation data during 3 months.
…”
Section: Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This experiment demonstrates that our monitoring system can reveal temporal variations of pore pressure in the geothermal reservoirs. Because the pore pressure is related to the seismicity 7 , we will be able to use this monitoring system for safe reservoir managements in geothermal power.
Figure 8 Monitoring results and geothermal operation data during 3 months.
…”
Section: Results and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve such a large number of CO 2 storage sites, we should manage multi CO 2 storage reservoirs in extensive areas using an innovative monitoring system for the stored CO 2 . Monitoring injected CO 2 in its reservoir is crucial for predicting the risk of CO 2 leakage, increasing efficiency, reducing the cost of CO 2 storage, and reducing the risk of induced seismicity 6 , 7 . Also, the information derived from monitoring is vital to obtain public acceptance for the projects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Therefore, reducing the cost of CO 2 capture in CCS projects calls for rapid progress in appropriate concepts or technology. Safety is another key factor for CCS projects; CO 2 leakage and injection-induced earthquakes should be carefully evaluated, 12 especially when storage sites are close to residential and industrial areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%