All Days 2009
DOI: 10.2118/124253-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore Networks and Fluid Flow in Gas Shales

Abstract: Favorable gas content, depth, and thickness, along with high brittleness of the Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin, North Texas, have made the basin one of the best shale-gas plays in North America. Using recent pore images and geochemical data for the Barnett Shale, we investigated potential effects of organic matter on petrophysical properties, pore networks and fluid flow in gas-shale systems. Four types of porous media are present in productive gas-shale systems: nonorganic matrix, org… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
218
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 366 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
218
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pore structures of shale are highly heterogeneous, with the pore size mainly ranging from nanometer to micrometer-sized [5,6]. Previous research has reported that nanometer-sized pores, which are predominantly associated with organic matter and clay minerals [6][7][8], could provide larger surface areas and higher adsorption energy for gas molecule adsorption [9][10][11][12], while micrometer-sized pores-which are generally associated with inorganic minerals [6]-are more likely to connect with induced fractures for gas flow and transport [13,14]. For gas desorption, once external conditions, such as temperature and pressure changes, for example, and artificial fractures disturb the equilibrium, the free gas molecules in fractures and macropore networks flow from high-pressure zones to low-pressure zones, and then gas that adsorbed onto the surface of organic matter and clay minerals starts to desorb, inducing a concentration gradient between the bulk particles and their surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pore structures of shale are highly heterogeneous, with the pore size mainly ranging from nanometer to micrometer-sized [5,6]. Previous research has reported that nanometer-sized pores, which are predominantly associated with organic matter and clay minerals [6][7][8], could provide larger surface areas and higher adsorption energy for gas molecule adsorption [9][10][11][12], while micrometer-sized pores-which are generally associated with inorganic minerals [6]-are more likely to connect with induced fractures for gas flow and transport [13,14]. For gas desorption, once external conditions, such as temperature and pressure changes, for example, and artificial fractures disturb the equilibrium, the free gas molecules in fractures and macropore networks flow from high-pressure zones to low-pressure zones, and then gas that adsorbed onto the surface of organic matter and clay minerals starts to desorb, inducing a concentration gradient between the bulk particles and their surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been no previous studies of shale matrix permeability over a range of effective stresses and pore pressures [14][15].…”
Section: Background Study On Stress Dependent Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expanding on the introduction above, flow in gas shale (and similarly tight rocks) is described by a combination of transport mechanisms acting at different scales [15][16]. It is common to denote transitions between these various flow regimes using the dimensionless Knudsen number, defined as:…”
Section: Flow Regime Effects On Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The matrix porosity generally is lower than 0.1, and the matrix permeability ranges from 1 nanoDarcy to 1 microDarcy (Wang et al 2009). The shale formation acts as both the source rock and the reservoir rock, so adsorbed gas and free gas coexist in shale reservoirs (Yao et al 2013a), where free gas is stored in the matrix pore space, and adsorbed gas can make up to 20 %-85 % of the total gas reserve (Hill and Nelson 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%