2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore, live root and necromass quantification in complex heterogeneous wetland soils using X-ray computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with previous studies, the development of a novel segmentation technique combining local adaptive thresholding and tubular shape detection gives us greater confidence in our capacity to capture the complexity of a saltmarsh subsurface environment: ground referencing tests confirmed that the μCT data accurately capture regions of dense roots as well as the position and structures of macropores (Chirol et al, 2021). Using μCT morphological data under various types of ground cover and under different sediment types allows us to explore the potential role of subsurface structure on shear strength with an unprecedented perspective on the 3D structure and interplay of pores and roots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with previous studies, the development of a novel segmentation technique combining local adaptive thresholding and tubular shape detection gives us greater confidence in our capacity to capture the complexity of a saltmarsh subsurface environment: ground referencing tests confirmed that the μCT data accurately capture regions of dense roots as well as the position and structures of macropores (Chirol et al, 2021). Using μCT morphological data under various types of ground cover and under different sediment types allows us to explore the potential role of subsurface structure on shear strength with an unprecedented perspective on the 3D structure and interplay of pores and roots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The scanned volumes were cropped to an 8.75 × 8.75 cm square base to reduce edge effects and remove any disturbance from sampling. All 24 scanned volumes were processed following the method detailed in Chirol et al (2021) to segment the μCT data into three phases: pore space, organic matter elements (including roots and degraded organic matter) and finally the bulk inorganic mineral phase. All elements larger than 5000 voxels (1.22 mm 3 ) were removed as noise, and the minimal thickness of elements at any point is twice the resolution, so 125 μm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Medicinal computed tomography image analysis facilitates studying the 3D root morphology of vegetation in undisturbed tidal marsh soils (Davey et al, 2011;Blum and Davey, 2013;Hanson et al, 2016;Wigand et al, 2016). CT-scanning enables the distinction of air-spaces, organic structures and mineral particulates by means of a standardized X-ray response (Hounsfield units HU;Hounsfield, 1979), which allows the 3D root-system structures (root-tissue and root-aerenchyma) to be reconstructed in-silico using segmentation and skeleton analysis methods (Gao et al, 2019;Chirol et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6,7], are limited in their application and development due to their heavy workload, destructive sampling approach and unachievable repeated measurements [8]. With the innovation and development of technology, some in situ non-destructive observation methods have become the hotspots of plant root parameter estimation and distribution modeling research [9], such as minirhizotrons [10], X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) [11], magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [12], ground-penetrating radar (GPR) method [13][14][15][16], etc. Among them, GPR is a non-intrusive geophysical technology that uses high-frequency electromagnetic waves to locate underground targets [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%