2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore geometry of sandstone derived from pulsed field gradient NMR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tortuosity is set to 1.5 in this study, which is a reliable estimate for coarse sand and gravel (e.g. Pape et al, 2006;Dlugosch et al, 2013). …”
Section: Estimation Of Effective Pore Radius and Hydraulic Conductivimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tortuosity is set to 1.5 in this study, which is a reliable estimate for coarse sand and gravel (e.g. Pape et al, 2006;Dlugosch et al, 2013). …”
Section: Estimation Of Effective Pore Radius and Hydraulic Conductivimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrical resistivity or diffusion measurements are used to estimate Γ by some authors e.g., Berryman and Blair (1987), Cornell and Katz (1953), Dullien (1975), Pape et al (2006), Walsh and Brace, (1984).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, tortuosity for hydraulic flow would not necessarily be the same as tortuosity for diffusion and electrical conduction (Bear, 1972;Carman, 1937;Pape et al, 2006). Whereas diffusion and electrical conduction in a pore have a piston-like displacement, fluid flow has a velocity profile with a lower velocity on the fluid-mineral interface.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are a series of experimental methods such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) [5,[32][33][34][35][36], and low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [35][36][37][38][39][40] which have been widely applied for qualitative and quantitative determination of pore structure characteristics of different types of reservoir rocks. Among them, high resolution SEM-based imaging techniques, for example, field emission SEM (FE-SEM) [19,20,[22][23][24][25], broad ion beam SEM (BIB-SEM) [21,27,29], and focused ion beam SEM (FIB-SEM) [26][27][28][29][30][31]41], are commonly used in the field of visualized characterization of nanoscale pore systems of tight reservoir rocks such as gas shales and fine-grained sandstones due to their high resolution imaging advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%