2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0309-1740(03)00030-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore formation in cured–smoked pork determined with image analysis—effects of tumbling and RN− gene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1993; Monin 1995). When the pore formation on the present material and an extended material was determined by image analysis, there were more pores in RN – carriers than in noncarriers, even though not significant in the present material (Hullberg and Ballerini 2003). This difference was mainly attributed to a greater number of small pores in RN – carriers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1993; Monin 1995). When the pore formation on the present material and an extended material was determined by image analysis, there were more pores in RN – carriers than in noncarriers, even though not significant in the present material (Hullberg and Ballerini 2003). This difference was mainly attributed to a greater number of small pores in RN – carriers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The reason for this pore formation is not yet understood, but the tendency found in the present study toward a higher degree of pores in processed meat from RNcarriers is most likely attributed to a weaker ultra structure in this meat (Estrade et al 1993;Monin 1995). When the pore formation on the present material and an extended material was determined by image analysis, there were more pores in RNcarriers than in noncarriers, even though not significant in the present material (Hullberg and Ballerini 2003). This difference was mainly attributed to a greater number of small pores in RNcarriers.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…1995; Ferrando and Spiess 2000), magnetic resonance imaging (Maas and Line 1995; Ramos‐Cabrer et al. 2005), computer vision technique (cameras) (Hullberg and Ballerini 2003; Du and Sun 2006), porosimetry (Rahman et al. 2002; Kassama and Ngadi 2005a) and most recently X‐ray computed tomography (CT) (Falcone et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding how these elements are configured, relate and interact to affect food quality, processing and process optimization has become very important in developing tailored and novel food items to meet the demand of today's diverse and sophisticated consumers (Heertj 1998;van Dalen et al 2003van Dalen et al , 2007. Several techniques have been used to study food microstructures and these include microscopy (Kalab et al 1995;Ferrando and Spiess 2000), magnetic resonance imaging (Maas and Line 1995;Ramos-Cabrer et al 2005), computer vision technique (cameras) (Hullberg and Ballerini 2003;Du and Sun 2006), porosimetry (Rahman et al 2002;Kassama and Ngadi 2005a) and most recently X-ray computed tomography (CT) (Falcone et al 2004;Trater et al 2005;Leonard et al 2008). X-ray CT provides a number of advantages over the other techniques such as noninvasive method of imaging and nonelaborate sample preparation procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since instrumental evaluation has its own advantageous over sensory assessment, like lowering running cost, saving time and speeding the generation of results, it is recommended to be included as a routine procedure (Bourne, 2002;Skriver, et al, 1999). Unfortunately, very few studies had attempted to establish correlation between sensory perception of texture and instrumental parameters or structural data (image analysis of micrographs) (Hullberg & Ballerini, 2003;Langton, et al, 1997), especially with saliva added, which is an important composition involved in food consumption. Saliva is a complex biological fluid, consisting mainly 99.5% of water, 0.3% of different proteins (e.g.…”
Section: Declaration By Authormentioning
confidence: 99%