2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore engineering towards highly efficient electrospun nanofibrous membranes for aerosol particle removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Q F value of PAN_F (0.05 Pa −1 ) was good, but this filter does not contain bactericidal nanoparticles. The Q F values of all our filter media, even after addition of TiO 2 , ZnO, and Ag nanoparticles, were comparable to those of previous studies on pristine PAN filters [62][63][64]. However, superficial velocity, particle size, and material composition might vary among studies and thus data should be compared with caution.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Filtration Performancesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The Q F value of PAN_F (0.05 Pa −1 ) was good, but this filter does not contain bactericidal nanoparticles. The Q F values of all our filter media, even after addition of TiO 2 , ZnO, and Ag nanoparticles, were comparable to those of previous studies on pristine PAN filters [62][63][64]. However, superficial velocity, particle size, and material composition might vary among studies and thus data should be compared with caution.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Filtration Performancesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Comparing these studies, it is possible to note that the filters reported in this study are composed of PAN material of small fibers diameter that probably explains the high-quality factor. In addition, a very high filtration efficiency (approximately 100% filtration efficiency) in the range of 9 to 300 nm aerosol particles diameters and quality factor (0.05) were reached by our PAN/Ag NPs filter in comparison to commercial filters (filtration efficiency less than 80% and quality factor of 0.02) reported elsewhere [17], [70], [71]. It should be noted that the face velocity, particle size, and material composition may be different in the aforementioned studies.…”
Section: Filtration Performance Of Nanofiber Filtersmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…For this reason, 50AgF had the highest Q F as a result of the lower pressure drop (68Pa) and also great efficiency (>98.65%) to remove nanoparticles (9-300 nm) from the air. A limited number of studies based on filtration theory have already investigated the quality factor effect of nanofibers filters [17], [71][72][73]. Comparing these studies, it is possible to note that the filters reported in this study are composed of PAN material of small fibers diameter that probably explains the high-quality factor.…”
Section: Filtration Performance Of Nanofiber Filtersmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations