2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.11.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pore characteristics of the carbonate shoal from fractal perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fractal dimensions derived from HPMI reflects the changes in the pore structure of sandstone rocks. 32,35,37,40,41 42 The results demonstrated that macropores and mesopores were relatively well developed in type A core samples, while all the three kinds of pores were developed in type B core samples. Additionally, the total fractal dimension D 0 and D HPMI were obtained from the slopes of the straight lines of the logarithmic scatter points and eqs 7 and 8, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The fractal dimensions derived from HPMI reflects the changes in the pore structure of sandstone rocks. 32,35,37,40,41 42 The results demonstrated that macropores and mesopores were relatively well developed in type A core samples, while all the three kinds of pores were developed in type B core samples. Additionally, the total fractal dimension D 0 and D HPMI were obtained from the slopes of the straight lines of the logarithmic scatter points and eqs 7 and 8, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is possibly because a relatively higher fraction of larger pores would contribute greatly to the brine absolute permeability compared to smaller pores. In addition, low-field NMR measurements were performed to understand the distribution of pore sizes because of the correlation between the transverse relaxation time ( T 2 ) and pore size. , The carbonate rock pores can be categorized as micropores ( T 2 < 100 ms), mesopores, and macropores ( T 2 > 100 ms). , In this study, four sections (<10 ms, 10–100 ms, 100–1000 ms, and >1000 ms) of the T 2 spectrum were divided in order to compare these samples in detail, as indicated in Table . Sample A-5 has the relatively higher increment porosity at T 2 > 1000 ms and fall in the range of 2–5%, whereas these samples have a lower increment porosity at T 2 < 100 ms in comparison with sample A-2 and A-6, as can be seen in Figure .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, low-field NMR measurements were performed to understand the distribution of pore sizes because of the correlation between the transverse relaxation time (T 2 ) and pore size. 43,44 The carbonate rock pores can be categorized as micropores (T 2 < 100 ms), mesopores, and macropores (T 2 > 100 ms). 43,45 In this study, four sections (<10 ms, 10−100 ms, 100−1000 ms, and >1000 ms) of the T 2 spectrum were divided in order to compare these samples in detail, as indicated in Table 4.…”
Section: Effect Of Rpm Concentration 231 Brine or DI Water Flooding (...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, it has been widely used in the shale pore structure field (Li et al, 2019a;Liu et al, 2020;Li, 2021;Liu et al, 2021). Pore image data, gas or liquid flow test data (such as nitrogen adsorption and mercury intrusion tests), and NMR data can be used to study the pore fractal characteristics (Yang et al, 2017;Liu J. S. et al, 2018;Tang et al, 2019;Wei et al, 2019). For different types of shale reservoir spaces, researchers have attempted to use different models such as the Frenkel-Halsey-Hill (FHH) model, Newton-Kantorovich (NK) model, and Neimark model to carry out fractal research on the shale pore structures (Ahmad and Mustafa, 2006;Pan et al, 2021;Chang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%