2014
DOI: 10.4321/s1135-57272014000300002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Porcentaje de cesáreas en mujeres de bajo riesgo: un indicador útil para comparar hospitales que atienden partos con riesgos diferentes

Abstract: (*) Ayuda de investigación de la Fundación Mapfre (convocatoria 2010).Conflicto de intereses: Ninguno en relación con este manuscrito. RESUMENFundamentos: el uso del "porcentaje de cesáreas" como indicador de calidad ha sido criticado por no considerar que los hospitales atienden partos con riesgos diferentes que podrían justificar su variabilidad. El objetivo de este trabajo es explorar las características de un indicador restringido al porcentaje de cesáreas en partos de bajo riesgo.Métodos: cohorte retrospe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this pro le, only 6% of women will have an EmCS. Similar ndings were found in Spanish hospitals, which de ned low-risk of CS to under-35, with no history of CS, between 37 and 41 gestational weeks, single fetus, cephalic presentation, and normal birthweight (27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this pro le, only 6% of women will have an EmCS. Similar ndings were found in Spanish hospitals, which de ned low-risk of CS to under-35, with no history of CS, between 37 and 41 gestational weeks, single fetus, cephalic presentation, and normal birthweight (27).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The rate of C-sections is thus 84.5% of all deliveries, significantly higher than the expected rate of approximately 15% for pregnancies in the general population. 17,18 This rate of C-section is also higher than that in pregnancies complicated by viral Influenza infection, where the likelihood of C-section did not increase relative to the general population. 19…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Of 201 deliveries reported, 182 were performed as C-sections. The rate of C-sections is thus 89% of all deliveries, significantly higher than the expected rate of approximately 15% for pregnancies in the general population [ 21 , 22 ]. This rate of C-section is also higher than that in pregnancies complicated by viral Influenza infection, where the likelihood of C-section did not increase relative to the general population [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%