Populism, inequality and representation: Negotiating ‘the 99%’ with Occupy London

Abstract

When Occupy London emerged with a global wave of protest movements in October 2011, it embodied and advanced discursive forms that have characterised the unsettling of political consensus following the financial crisis. The central claim that ‘We are the 99%’ staged a fundamental tension, between a populist appeal to the figure of ‘the people’, and a contrary orientation seeking to critique inequality while rejecting forms of representation and identity. This article – which draws on three years of ethnographic fieldwork with Occupy London (October 2011–October 2014) and a critical theorisation of the figure of ‘the people’ in radical movements – follows movement participants’ negotiation of the tension at the heart of the discourse of ‘the 99%’. It offers an account of the conflicting meanings and practices that emerged, arguing that the result was a creative contradiction that sustained the movement for a time, while setting the terms of its ultimate breakdown. Identifying the concept of ‘representation’ as the site of particular controversy, this is unpicked through a number of key figures (Pitkin, Marx, Spivak, Puchner, Deleuze and Guattari) as the basis for an empirical account of Occupy’s practice of assembly, which offered partial, imperfect ‘solutions’ to these tensions. The article concludes with some implications for the limits and possibilities of both a grassroots populism and a politics against representation, in the context of political developments since.

Rejoinder:Clamour of Nationalismsymposium

“…It remains however true that any socialist inclined naming of a profiteering class against whom a majority might be named is not entirely dissimilar to the political templates characteristic of populism (Matthews, 2019). But here we might want to retain one feature of what is understood as populism but dispense with the other.…”

Crowd Cohesion and Protest Outcomes

“…Cohesion lagged despite the availability of a unifying slogan, "We are the 99 percent," denouncing economic inequality. The slogan "basically fell out of use" amid internal disagreements over whom and what Occupy London represented (Matthews 2019(Matthews , 1029). An editorialist wrote, "This apparent lack of cohesion has given birth to a monstrous public relations machine, that sends out just enough information to build solidarity while sufficiently scrambling the message so that it can't be shoehorned into a convenient narrative" (Haddow 2011).…”

Assemblies, Coalitions, and Conflicts Over Free Speech: From “Trespass” to “Encroachment” in Urban Space at Hyde Park, London, 1861–1962

“…Anyhow, one democratic quandary for progressives is not so much that some are excluded from formal political processes, but that those who govern in society will often already include sections of the subordinated in the political order through everyday organisations (McNay 2014:83; see also Mitchell and Staeheli 2007;Parson 2015). That is to say, hegemony of the dominant operates through state mechanisms, through ordinary life, and in everyday spaces (see also Doucette 2020;Matthews 2019). Judith Butler's and the Bakhtin Circle's respective ideas contain some similarities with those from the "political" school, but they also overcome difficulties in them.…”