NZ J Ecol 2018
DOI: 10.20417/nzjecol.42.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population viability analyses in New Zealand: a review

Abstract: Biodiversity assets often require conservation management, which, in turn, necessitates decisions about which ecosystem, community or species should be prioritised to receive resources. Population viability analysis (PVA) uses a suite of quantitative methods to estimate the likelihood of population decline and extinction for a given species, and can be used to assess a population's status, providing useful information to decision-makers. In New Zealand, a range of taxa have been analysed using the PVA approach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulation modelling takes many forms, from agent‐based models, population viability analyses and processed based models, which can be used for forecasting, management, and theory development. Population viability analyses (PVAs) are widely used in conservation, although typically with a bias towards birds and other charismatic taxa (Simpkins et al, 2018). For amphidromous galaxiids, PVAs could be used to project population trends and inform likely effectiveness of potential management interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulation modelling takes many forms, from agent‐based models, population viability analyses and processed based models, which can be used for forecasting, management, and theory development. Population viability analyses (PVAs) are widely used in conservation, although typically with a bias towards birds and other charismatic taxa (Simpkins et al, 2018). For amphidromous galaxiids, PVAs could be used to project population trends and inform likely effectiveness of potential management interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these reviews, along with other sources of evidence, are required for decisions on invasive species management. The robustness of studies underpinning these evidential reviews has received little scrutiny (but see Simpkins et al 2018), although some previous studies have noted deficiencies (e.g. Clayton and Cowan 2010; Smith et al 2017) and recommended that greater robustness of evidence is desirable (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%