2009
DOI: 10.1675/063.032.0107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Trends of Atlantic Coast Piping Plovers, 1986–2006

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Management of Piping Plovers for increased population growth has focused on increasing reproductive rates (Murphy et al 2003, Rezansoff et al 2006) because low reproductive success was considered the primary reason for their endangered status (Murphy et al 2000) and reproductive success was amenable to management. Although fledging rates in our study area would be considered low compared to other areas (Hecht and Melvin 2009), our model suggests that they appear to be either at or above the level needed for a stationary population, even in light of moderate modeled annual variation in survival (CV = 0.09). Adult survival rates do appear to be lower for the Great Lakes population in the United States (Le Dee et al 2010), and probably also for the population in eastern Canada (Calvert et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Management of Piping Plovers for increased population growth has focused on increasing reproductive rates (Murphy et al 2003, Rezansoff et al 2006) because low reproductive success was considered the primary reason for their endangered status (Murphy et al 2000) and reproductive success was amenable to management. Although fledging rates in our study area would be considered low compared to other areas (Hecht and Melvin 2009), our model suggests that they appear to be either at or above the level needed for a stationary population, even in light of moderate modeled annual variation in survival (CV = 0.09). Adult survival rates do appear to be lower for the Great Lakes population in the United States (Le Dee et al 2010), and probably also for the population in eastern Canada (Calvert et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Productivity in our study was generally below the level needed for a stationary population in light of the highest annual variance in survival rates we included in the stochastic models (CV = 0.20, Melvin and Gibbs 1994). This was also the case on the Atlantic Coast, where Piping Plover productivity was usually below the 1.5 needed for a stationary population, given a CV of 0.2 in survival rates (Melvin and Gibbs 1994, Hecht and Melvin 2009). As in our study area, however, the Atlantic Coast population grew rapidly when mean productivity was below the high benchmark, indicating that the CV of survival is probably considerably less than 0.2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the majority of cases, these individuals conducted comprehensive surveys of their sites, meaning that 95–100% of known or recently occupied breeding locations as well as locations that appeared suitable for breeding were surveyed repeatedly in May through July. In instances where sites could not be visited repeatedly, sites were surveyed at least once (at all known or suspected breeding locations) during a nine-day period standardized for the entire Atlantic coast population [10]. The specific number of random points visited each year at a given site was determined by the number of nests observed at that site in the previous year (minimum 5 points).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the species’ recovery plan [9], piping plovers are observed by a large number of trained monitors throughout their geographic distribution [10]. Monitors represent federal and state agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and land-owning trusts and possess varying levels of expertise in environmental assessment and use of specialized equipment (e.g., global navigation satellite system receiver, GNSS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%