2003
DOI: 10.1139/f03-034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population structure of two ecologically distinct forms of ninespine stickleback,Pungitius pungitius: gene flow regimes and genetic diversity based on mtDNA sequence variations

Abstract: The population structure and its effect on genetic diversity were investigated in two ecologically distinct forms (fresh-and brackish-water types) of ninespine stickleback (Pungitius pungitius L.), which coexist on the coast of eastern Hokkaido, Japan. Obvious population subdivision (ϕ ST = 0.102 to 0.668) between freshwater systems in the freshwater type compared with that in the brackish-water type (ϕ ST = <0 to 0.078) was revealed on the basis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region sequence variations.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, 31 CR haplotypes were found from 151 Japanese P. pungitius (Takahashi et al. 2003). As mentioned above, such a low level of mitochondrial diversity found in P. kaibarae may be attributed to its highly confined and fragmented distribution range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 31 CR haplotypes were found from 151 Japanese P. pungitius (Takahashi et al. 2003). As mentioned above, such a low level of mitochondrial diversity found in P. kaibarae may be attributed to its highly confined and fragmented distribution range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary admixture between divergent populations may also result in complicated genetic population structures (Avise & Smith, 1974;Yamamoto et al, 2004a). In freshwater and euryhaline fishes, such genetic structures have been investigated on various spatial scales, and the effects of, for example, dispersal and historical events, discussed accordingly (Avise, 2000;Matsubara et al, 2001;Takahashi et al, 2003;Yamamoto et al, 2004a). There have been few studies, however, comparing the genetic structures of closely related species on a fine scale, such as within a river system (Heithaus & Laushman, 1997;Laroche et al, 1999;Swartz et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The freshwater type exclusively occupies freshwater areas within river systems, whereas the brackish-water type occupies brackish-water areas, such as estuaries and lagoons. Since these two forms are reciprocally monophyletic (Takahashi et al ., 2003), the evolutionary background is differ from that of the anadromous-freshwater system in the threespine stickleback of which freshwater forms were considered to have multiple, independent origins (McKinnon and Rundle, 2002). Takata et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%