2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population structure and genotypic variation of Crataegus pontica inferred by molecular markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) were in line with the expectations of high morphological variation within populations and low differentiation between populations, as observed in rowans [ 28 , 29 , 31 ] and other insect-pollinated and animal-dispersed tree species [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The relatively high level of among-tree variation within the populations is probably a result of both phenotypic plasticity to specific micro-environmental conditions experienced by each tree, and genetic differentiation among individual trees [ 28 , 29 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) were in line with the expectations of high morphological variation within populations and low differentiation between populations, as observed in rowans [ 28 , 29 , 31 ] and other insect-pollinated and animal-dispersed tree species [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 ]. The relatively high level of among-tree variation within the populations is probably a result of both phenotypic plasticity to specific micro-environmental conditions experienced by each tree, and genetic differentiation among individual trees [ 28 , 29 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As retrotransposon marker systems were successfully used for molecular characterization of Diospyros kaki (Guo et al, 2006), wheat (Carvalho et al, 2010), Citrus (Biswas et al, 2010), grapevine species and cultivars (D'Onofrio et al, 2010;Guo et al, 2014), flax (Smykal et al, 2011), alfalfa (Abdollahi Mandoulakani et al, 2011, cocoyam (Doungous et al, 2015), taro (Doungous et al, 2015), lilium (Lee et al, 2015) and howtron (Rahmani et al, 2015). The aim of the study was to use three iPBS, IRAP and REMAP retrotransposon based marker systems for the first time to analyze the genetic diversity, to compare three different marker systems in order to reveal their diversity indices, to construct phylogenetic trees in order to resolve the relationships in Mediterranean Pistacia species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al (2008), Khiari et al (2015) and Emami et al (2018) also used SSRs developed from apple and pear. Few studies in the literature have evaluated the molecular characterization of hawthorn genotypes (Zhang et al 2008;Dai et al 2009;Rajeb et al 2010;Yilmaz et al 2010;Beigmohamadi and Rahmani 2011;MirAli et al 2011;Serce et al 2011;Khiari et al 2015;Rahmani et al 2015;Erfani-Moghadam et al 2016;Fang et al 2017;Emami et al 2018). In the current study, we present polymorphic SSR loci for hawthorn that were developed from apple and pear (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%