1997
DOI: 10.2307/2960653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Size and Density Effects in Pollination: Pollinator Foraging and Plant Reproductive Success in Experimental Arrays of Brassica Kaber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

14
368
4
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(395 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
14
368
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This was recently supported by a study by Jakobsson et al (2008) (Schulke and Waser 2001) and, when foraging, respond to large-scale changes in habitat structure (Menzel et al 1997;Steffan-Dewenter et al 2002). However, in other studies, it has been shown that foraging behaviour of pollinators can change in response to floral abundance at small spatial scales (Kunin 1997;Goverde et al 2002;Ghazoul 2006;Lopezaraiza et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…This was recently supported by a study by Jakobsson et al (2008) (Schulke and Waser 2001) and, when foraging, respond to large-scale changes in habitat structure (Menzel et al 1997;Steffan-Dewenter et al 2002). However, in other studies, it has been shown that foraging behaviour of pollinators can change in response to floral abundance at small spatial scales (Kunin 1997;Goverde et al 2002;Ghazoul 2006;Lopezaraiza et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The differences between sites appear to be robust if one considers that our lack of knowledge regarding several parameters (pollinator species composition, age, sex, experience of individuals) introduced potential variance in our data that would favour the null hypothesis that no differences exist. While the majority of studies have observed that the density of flowering species can be positively correlated with pollinator visitation rates and plant reproductive success (Gunton and Kunin 2009;Kunin 1993Kunin , 1997Sih and Baltus 1987;Sun et al 2010), so far no one has explicitly focussed on the phenotypic plasticity of pollinator foraging behaviour facing cheaters derived from a rewarding species in dense and sparse populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant populations/communities with higher densities generally attract a larger number of pollinators and have a higher reproductive output than lower densities (Bernhardt et al 2008;Gunton and Kunin 2009;Kunin 1997). Large floral aggregations supposedly emit more olfactory and visual cues to attract pollinators (Shao et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, a greater number of flowers might mean a reduction of, or no effect on, the visitation rate of each individual flower (Klinkhamer & Jong 1990;Mitchell et al 2004;Grindeland et al 2005). Likewise, a high density of flowering individuals in an area might lead to enhanced visitation for each due to facilitation (Kunin 1997;Thompson 2001;Moeller 2004;Makino & Sakai 2007;Brys & Jacquemyn 2010;Hegland 2014). Nonetheless, high densities of individuals that overlap in flowering, both in time and space, might cause competition for pollinators, leading to decreased visitation rates per individual (Mustajärvi et al 2001;Sargent & Ackerly 2008;Hegland 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%