Population-scale patient safety data reveal inequalities in adverse events before and during COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract

Adverse patient safety events were associated with 110 thousand deaths in the U.S. alone in 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic has further challenged the ability of healthcare systems to ensure medication safety, and its effects on patient safety remain unknown. Here, we investigate negative outcomes associated with medication use before and during the pandemic. Using a dataset of 10,443,476 reports involving 3,624 drugs and 19,193 adverse events, we develop an algorithmic approach to analyze the pandemic’s impact on incidence of drug safety events by evaluating disproportional reporting relative to the pre-pandemic time, quantifying unexpected trends in clinical outcomes, and adjusting for drug interference. Among 64 adverse events identified by our analyses, we find 54 have increased incidence rates during the pandemic, even though reporting of adverse events has decreased by 4.4% overall. We find clinically relevant differences in drug safety outcomes between demographic groups. Comparing to male patients, women report 47.0% more distinct adverse events whose occurrence significantly increased during the pandemic relative to pre-pandemic levels. Out of 53 adverse events with the pre-pandemic gender gap, 33 have increased gap during the pandemic more than would have been expected had the pandemic not occurred. While musculoskeletal and metabolic side effects are disproportionately enriched in women during the pandemic, immune-related adverse events are enriched only in men. We also find the number of adverse events with a higher reporting ratio during the pandemic in adults is higher (16.8%) than in older patients (adjusted for population size). Our findings have implications for safe medication use and public health policy and highlight the role of variation in adverse events for improving patient safety during a public health emergency.

Exploring Safety Culture in the ICU of a Large Acute Teaching Hospital through Triangulating Different Data Sources

“…This study was completed after several waves of COVID-19, and burnout and exhaustion experienced by staff may have contributed to reduced reporting and impacted the SC. Internationally, studies have shown there has been a reduction in reporting during COVID-19, estimated at 4.4% overall [23,42,43]. When examined in terms of category, the reduction was in "no harm" and "near miss" AEs, with little change in the number of "harm" events reported, which seems to be reflected in our study [23].…”