Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00859.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population responses to perturbations: predictions and responses from laboratory mite populations

Abstract: Summary1. Mathematical models are frequently used to make predictions of the response of a population to management interventions or environmental perturbations, but it is rarely possible to make controlled or replicated tests of the accuracy of these predictions. 2. We report results from replicated laboratory experiments on populations of a soil mite, Sancassania berlesei, living in 'constant' or 'variable' environments. We experimentally perturbed vital rates, via selective harvesting, and examined the popu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, we examined how the number of replicates per density level affects the accuracy of density dependence estimates. If there is little spatial variation, estimates of the strength of density dependence are expected to remain quite constant (Benton et al 2004), which would allow parameterization of density dependence from a small number of replicates. We again used shoot mass as a model rate and sub‐sampled blocks without replacement from the full observed data set (20 blocks) with sample sizes of 3, 5, 10, 15 and 19 blocks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, we examined how the number of replicates per density level affects the accuracy of density dependence estimates. If there is little spatial variation, estimates of the strength of density dependence are expected to remain quite constant (Benton et al 2004), which would allow parameterization of density dependence from a small number of replicates. We again used shoot mass as a model rate and sub‐sampled blocks without replacement from the full observed data set (20 blocks) with sample sizes of 3, 5, 10, 15 and 19 blocks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used bootstrap resampling to estimate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the mean number and the mean size of individuals of relevant life stages per treatment group (cf. Benton et al, 2004). We furthermore divided the experimental period into three periods, day 100-190, day 191-280 and day 281-365, and calculated 95% CIs per period to assess long-term (instead of transient) temporal changes in life stage number and mean body size over time within each treatment group.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the kittiwake Rissa tridactyla, survival was age dependent, and individuals with high survival probability were also more likely to breed, presumably because of between-individual variation in quality . Failure to account for such latent between-individual differences can lead to systematic overestimation of population variability and extinction risk Fox 2002, 2003), underestimation of the uncertainty in population forecasts (Clark 2003), very large biases in estimates of demographic rates (Clark et al , 2004, and incorrect predictions of population responses to demographic perturbations (Benton et al 2004).…”
Section: Integral Models For Complex Demography 411mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the kittiwake Rissa tridactyla, survival was age dependent, and individuals with high survival probability were also more likely to breed, presumably because of between-individual variation in quality . Failure to account for such latent between-individual differences can lead to systematic overestimation of population variability and extinction risk Fox 2002, 2003), underestimation of the uncertainty in population forecasts (Clark 2003), very large biases in estimates of demographic rates (Clark et al , 2004, and incorrect predictions of population responses to demographic perturbations (Benton et al 2004).When several variables are needed to predict demographic performance, estimating a matrix model becomes difficult because many between-class transitions have to be estimated (Law 1983;Caswell 2001). For example, "the construction of models using both size and age … may be impractical because of the large numbers of categories required" (Caswell 1988, p. 94).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%