Population Psychiatric Medication Prescription Rates following a Terrorist Attack

Abstract

Introduction:While several population-based studies have documented behavioral health disturbances following terrorist attacks, a number of mental health service utilization analyses present conflicting conclusions.Purpose:The purpose of this study was to determine if mental health service utilization increased following a terrorist attack by assessing changes in psychoactive drug prescription rates.Methods:The rate of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) prescriptions was measured among New York State Medicaid enrollees before and after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. The association between geographic proximity to the events and changes in the rate of SSRI prescriptions around 11 September 2001 was assessed.Results:From September to December 2001, among individuals residing within three miles of the World Trade Center site, there was an 18.2% increase in the SSRI prescription rate compared to the previous eight-month period (p = 0.0011). While there was a 9.3% increase for non-New York City residents, this change was not statistically significant (p = 0.74).Conclusions:There was a quantifiable increase in the dispensing of psychoactive drugs following the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, and this effect varied by geographic proximity to the events. These findings build on the growing body of knowledge on the pervasive effects of disasters and terrorist events for population health, and demonstrate the need to include mental and behavioral health as key components of surge capacity and public health response to mass traumas.

Early Childhood Exposure to Anesthesia and Risk of Developmental and Behavioral Disorders in a Sibling Birth Cohort

“…While we, among others, have put large administrative health datasets to public health use, 37, 38 administrative data are a blunt instrument to assess possibly subtle neurocognitive outcomes. There will, inevitably, be measurement error, particularly in diagnoses which are abstracted by nonclinical personnel and must conform to insurance billing standards.…”

The impact of the Canterbury earthquakes on prescribing for mental health

“…In the presence of a functioning healthcare system, psychotropic use in this context can be regarded as an indirect measure of community psychiatric morbidity (Usher et al, 2012). Study designs include phone surveys of affected individuals addressing medication use (Boscarino et al, 2003) and pharmaco-epidemiological studies extracting prescribing medication rates for populations (Rossi et al, 2011) or sub-populations such as insurance holders (DiMaggio et al, 2007). The most consistent findings are short-term increases in prescribing of sedating medication (benzodiazepines and antipsychotics).…”

Rate of Prescription of Antidepressant and Anxiolytic Drugs after Cyclone Yasi in North Queensland

“…16,17 The two latter conditions can lead to the prescription of psychotropic drugs in an attempt to relieve the symptoms of distress, particularly the symptoms of acute stress disorder (ASD) and PTSD. 7,16,19 All three studies reported an increase in the prescription of psychotropic drugs, and hence assumed an increased usage of drugs used to treat psychological distress by members of the community. 7,16,19 All three studies reported an increase in the prescription of psychotropic drugs, and hence assumed an increased usage of drugs used to treat psychological distress by members of the community.…”

“…7,18 To date, only three studies have attempted to determine the extent of psychological distress in a community by measuring the changes in psychotropic drug prescription rates. The first study used a telephone survey, 19 the second measured the use of a specific group of antidepressant drugs only, 16 and the most recent study used a pharmaco-epidemiological approach to compare the usage of antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs after the event with the same time period in the previous year. The first study used a telephone survey, 19 the second measured the use of a specific group of antidepressant drugs only, 16 and the most recent study used a pharmaco-epidemiological approach to compare the usage of antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs after the event with the same time period in the previous year.…”