2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2017.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in hospitalized elderly patients using cystatin C as an indicator of renal function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
22
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…F fat , included in NFM as the factor describing the influence of fat mass for CL, was not significantly different from 1, and F fat , for volume of distribution, was not significantly different from 0. 12,14,15,25,49 In the present study RF was an important covariate of CL and markedly improved model fitting ( OFV 61.7, df 1, P < .05). 32,48 Teicoplanin exhibited a hydrophilic character, and few teicoplanin distributed organic phases in a previous study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…F fat , included in NFM as the factor describing the influence of fat mass for CL, was not significantly different from 1, and F fat , for volume of distribution, was not significantly different from 0. 12,14,15,25,49 In the present study RF was an important covariate of CL and markedly improved model fitting ( OFV 61.7, df 1, P < .05). 32,48 Teicoplanin exhibited a hydrophilic character, and few teicoplanin distributed organic phases in a previous study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…12,[14][15][16]25,46,47 The teicoplanin concentrations were mainly collected in the elimination phase, with some being from the distribution phase (Figure 1). 12,[14][15][16]25,46,47 The teicoplanin concentrations were mainly collected in the elimination phase, with some being from the distribution phase (Figure 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations