Population pharmacokinetic and safety analysis of ropivacaine used for erector spinae plane blocks

Abstract

IntroductionErector spinae plane blocks have become popular for thoracic surgery. Despite a theoretically favorable safety profile, intercostal spread occurs and systemic toxicity is possible. Pharmacokinetic data are needed to guide safe dosing.MethodsFifteen patients undergoing thoracic surgery received continuous erector spinae plane blocks with ropivacaine 150 mg followed by subsequent boluses of 40 mg every 6 hours and infusion of 2 mg/hour. Arterial blood samples were obtained over 12 hours and analyzed using non-linear mixed effects modeling, which allowed for conducting simulations of clinically relevant dosing scenarios. The primary outcome was the Cmaxof ropivacaine in erector spinae plane blocks.ResultsThe mean age was 66 years, mean weight was 77.5 kg, and mean ideal body weight was 60 kg. The mean Cmaxwas 2.5 ±1.1 mg/L, which occurred at a median time of 10 (7–47) min after initial injection. Five patients developed potentially toxic ropivacaine levels but did not experience neurological symptoms. Another patient reported transient neurological toxicity symptoms. Our data suggested that using a maximum ropivacaine dose of 2.5 mg/kg based on ideal body weight would have prevented all toxicity events. Simulation predicted that reducing the initial dose to 75 mg with the same subsequent intermittent bolus dosing would decrease the risk of toxic levels to <1%.ConclusionLocal anesthetic systemic toxicity can occur with erector spinae plane blocks and administration of large, fixed doses of ropivacaine should be avoided, especially in patients with low ideal body weights. Weight-based ropivacaine dosing could reduce toxicity risk.Trial registration numberNCT04807504; clinicaltrials.gov.

Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity in Cardiac Surgery Patient with Erector Spinae Plane Catheter: A Case Report

“…Beyond general recommendations including weight-based dosing and institutional standards, specific guidelines for regional catheter management in critically ill patients are lacking. 7 Written Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and all patient-protected health information has been deidentified. This case demonstrates a confluence of factors that led to LAST, initially misdiagnosed as a stroke, in a patient in the cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) receiving intermittent bolus lidocaine regimen through an interfascial plane catheter.…”