1998
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97243.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Population Persistence, Pollination Mutualisms, and Figs in Fragmented Tropical Landscapes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Encounters between receptive syconia and their pollinators in natural environments are made more difficult by low densities of many fig tree populations (Hubbell and Foster 1986;Mawdsley et al 1998), the short life spans of their pollinators (Kjellberg et al 1988;Herre et al 2008), a commonly synchronous fruiting phenology that forces pollinators to disperse between trees (Ware and Compton 1994a), and the variable and unpredictable numbers of receptive syconia on different trees (Patel and Mckey 1998). The extended duration of receptivity seen in F. semicordata can be interpreted as a response to the possibility of pollinator shortages that these factors generate, thereby increasing the reproductive success of the plants and benefitting the fig-fig wasp mutualism in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encounters between receptive syconia and their pollinators in natural environments are made more difficult by low densities of many fig tree populations (Hubbell and Foster 1986;Mawdsley et al 1998), the short life spans of their pollinators (Kjellberg et al 1988;Herre et al 2008), a commonly synchronous fruiting phenology that forces pollinators to disperse between trees (Ware and Compton 1994a), and the variable and unpredictable numbers of receptive syconia on different trees (Patel and Mckey 1998). The extended duration of receptivity seen in F. semicordata can be interpreted as a response to the possibility of pollinator shortages that these factors generate, thereby increasing the reproductive success of the plants and benefitting the fig-fig wasp mutualism in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Milton et al ., 1982; Anstett et al. , 1995; Herre, 1996; Kalko et al ., 1996; Mawdsley et al. , 1998; Korine et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, phenological studies on Ficus suggest that constant flower and fruit production throughout the year should be maintained to avoid the local extinction of pollinators (Milton et al ., 1982; Anstett et al. , 1995; Mawdsley et al ., 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer term, persistence of fig tree and fig wasp populations is linked to habitat fragmentation (Mawdsley et al, 1998) and the dispersal abilities of the pollinators (Bronstein et al, 1990). Host-finding among fig wasps is surprisingly effective, and some fig wasps can disperse more than 100 km between natal trees and receptive figs (Ahmed et al, 2009), but the longer that females are in the air, the more susceptible they will be to dehydration and the effects of increased ambient temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%